Pedicle Screw Systems Market By Type (Traditional Pedicle Screws, Expandable Pedicle Screws, Biomechanical Pedicle Screws), By Material (Titanium, Stainless Steel, Biocomposite), By End-User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Orthopedic Centers), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Pedicle Screw Systems Market was valued at USD 2.8 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 4.8 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 9.0% during 2025 - 2030.

The pedicle screw systems market is experiencing substantial growth, driven by the increasing prevalence of spinal disorders and the rising number of spinal surgeries worldwide. Pedicle screws, used for the stabilization and correction of the spine in cases of deformities, fractures, and degenerative diseases, have become a fundamental component in spinal fusion surgeries. The demand for these systems is also fueled by the rising elderly population who are more susceptible to spinal conditions such as scoliosis and osteoporosis, along with advancements in spinal surgical techniques and materials.

Technological innovations in the design and materials of pedicle screws, including more advanced biomechanical properties and ease of use, have contributed to the widespread adoption of these devices. Furthermore, the growing awareness regarding spinal health, along with improved diagnostic tools that enable early detection of spinal issues, is pushing the demand for pedicle screw systems. The market is also benefiting from advancements in minimally invasive spinal surgeries, which require high precision and specialized pedicle screw systems, further enhancing their utility in the healthcare sector.

Traditional Pedicle Screws Segment is Largest Owing to Their Widespread Use in Spinal Surgeries

The traditional pedicle screws segment holds the largest share in the pedicle screw systems market, owing to their established track record and widespread use in spinal surgeries. These screws are used in a variety of spinal conditions such as fractures, scoliosis, and degenerative disc diseases. Traditional pedicle screws provide stability to the spine by anchoring into the pedicle of the vertebrae, offering a reliable and well-understood method of spinal fixation.

While newer types of pedicle screws have emerged with advanced features, traditional pedicle screws remain a preferred choice due to their proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness. These screws are widely available and used in both complex and routine spinal surgeries, making them an essential part of the orthopedic market. The large volume of spinal surgeries conducted using traditional pedicle screws ensures that this segment continues to dominate the market in terms of sales and usage.

 Pedicle Screw Systems Market    Size

Titanium Material Segment is Largest Owing to Its Durability and Biocompatibility

The titanium material segment leads the pedicle screw systems market, driven by the superior properties of titanium in spinal surgery applications. Titanium is widely recognized for its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, durability, and biocompatibility, which are crucial in minimizing the risk of rejection and complications after surgery. As a non-corrosive material, titanium screws are ideal for long-term use within the human body, especially in spinal fusion surgeries where long-term stability is essential.

The demand for titanium-based pedicle screws is expected to continue growing as the material’s advantages in terms of mechanical properties, lightweight structure, and minimal risk of allergy or rejection by the body are significant factors for their adoption by surgeons. These characteristics make titanium the material of choice for spinal implants, ensuring the segment’s leading position in the market.

Hospitals & Clinics Segment is Largest Owing to High Demand for Spinal Surgeries

The hospitals and clinics segment is the largest end-user in the pedicle screw systems market, primarily due to the high volume of spinal surgeries conducted in these healthcare facilities. Hospitals and clinics are equipped with the necessary infrastructure, including specialized spinal surgeons and operating rooms, to carry out a wide range of spinal procedures, from routine fusions to complex corrective surgeries.

The increasing number of surgeries performed in hospitals and clinics, along with the growing patient population requiring spinal treatments, directly drives the demand for pedicle screw systems in these settings. As the primary locations for advanced surgical care, hospitals and clinics continue to dominate the market in terms of both the number of procedures performed and the adoption of new technologies in spinal surgery.

North America is Largest Region Owing to Advanced Healthcare Infrastructure and High Spinal Surgery Rates

North America holds the largest share of the pedicle screw systems market, driven by its advanced healthcare infrastructure, high rates of spinal surgeries, and increasing demand for orthopedic treatments. The United States, in particular, has a well-established market for spinal implants, supported by a large number of specialized orthopedic centers, hospitals, and surgical clinics that frequently perform spinal surgeries.

In addition to the high volume of surgeries, the region benefits from the presence of major market players who are constantly innovating to provide the latest advancements in pedicle screw systems. The adoption of minimally invasive techniques and the growing awareness of spinal health are further contributing to the dominance of North America in this market. As the region continues to invest in healthcare and orthopedic research, its position as the largest market is expected to remain strong.

 Pedicle Screw Systems Market    Size by Region 2030

Competitive Landscape

The pedicle screw systems market is competitive, with numerous players involved in the development and distribution of spinal implants and surgical tools. Leading companies in the market include Medtronic, DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson), Stryker Corporation, and NuVasive, which are recognized for their advanced offerings in the pedicle screw systems category. These companies are investing heavily in research and development to improve the design, material, and functionality of pedicle screws, driving innovation in the market.

In addition to large companies, there is a rise in smaller firms focusing on niche markets and specialized solutions for specific spinal conditions. Companies are also increasingly adopting partnerships and collaborations to expand their market reach and improve product offerings. As the demand for spinal surgeries increases, particularly with the aging population, the competitive landscape is expected to intensify, with a continued focus on enhancing product performance and ensuring better patient outcomes.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Medtronic
  • Stryker Corporation
  • DePuy Synthes
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Globus Medical
  • NuVasive
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Orthofix International
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • K2M (A subsidiary of Stryker)
  • RTI Surgical
  • Aesculap (A B. Braun company)
  • SeaSpine
  • SpineWave
  • X-spine Systems

Recent Developments:

  • In December 2024, Medtronic launched a new pedicle screw system with enhanced adjustability for spinal surgeries.
  • In November 2024, Stryker Corporation expanded its pedicle screw portfolio with a new minimally invasive implant system.
  • In October 2024, DePuy Synthes introduced an advanced titanium pedicle screw system designed for improved spinal stability.
  • In September 2024, Zimmer Biomet received FDA approval for its next-generation biomechanical pedicle screw system.
  • In August 2024, Globus Medical unveiled a new expandable pedicle screw system for more precise spinal fixation.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 2.8 billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 4.8 billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

9.0%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Pedicle Screw Systems Market By Type (Traditional Pedicle Screws, Expandable Pedicle Screws, Biomechanical Pedicle Screws), By Material (Titanium, Stainless Steel, Biocomposite), By End-User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Orthopedic Centers)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Medtronic, Stryker Corporation, DePuy Synthes, Zimmer Biomet, Globus Medical, NuVasive, Smith & Nephew, Orthofix International, Johnson & Johnson, K2M (A subsidiary of Stryker), RTI Surgical, Aesculap (A B. Braun company), SeaSpine, SpineWave, X-spine Systems

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Traditional Pedicle Screws

   4.2. Expandable Pedicle Screws

   4.3. Biomechanical Pedicle Screws

   4.4. Others

5. Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Material (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Titanium

   5.2. Stainless Steel

   5.3. Biocomposite

   5.4. Others

6. Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Hospitals & Clinics

   6.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

   6.3. Orthopedic Centers

   6.4. Others

7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Regional Overview

   7.2. North America

      7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      7.2.3. Opportunities

      7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      7.2.5. Technology Trends

      7.2.6. North America Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Type

      7.2.7. North America Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Material

      7.2.8. North America Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by End-User

      7.2.9. By Country

         7.2.9.1. US

               7.2.9.1.1. US Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Type

               7.2.9.1.2. US Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by Material

               7.2.9.1.3. US Pedicle Screw Systems Market, by End-User

         7.2.9.2. Canada

         7.2.9.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   7.3. Europe

   7.4. Asia-Pacific

   7.5. Latin America

   7.6. Middle East & Africa

8. Competitive Landscape

   8.1. Overview of the Key Players

   8.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      8.2.2. Market Consolidation

      8.2.3. Product Innovation

   8.3. Company Share Analysis

   8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      8.4.1. Strategic Overview

      8.4.2. Product Innovations

   8.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   8.8. Manufacturing Network

      8.8.1. Locations

      8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   8.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   8.11. Buying Criteria

9. Company Profiles

   9.1. Medtronic

      9.1.1. Company Overview

      9.1.2. Company Financials

      9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      9.1.4. Recent Developments

      9.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   9.2. Stryker Corporation

   9.3. DePuy Synthes

   9.4. Zimmer Biomet

   9.5. Globus Medical

   9.6. NuVasive

   9.7. Smith & Nephew

   9.8. Orthofix International

   9.9. Johnson & Johnson

   9.10. K2M (A subsidiary of Stryker)

   9.11. RTI Surgical

   9.12. Aesculap (A B. Braun company)

   9.13. SeaSpine

   9.14. SpineWave

   9.15. X-spine Systems

10. Appendix

 

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Pedicle Screw Systems Market . In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Pedicle Screw Systems Market . The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Pedicle Screw Systems Market . These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options