As per Intent Market Research, the Osteoporosis Treatment Market was valued at USD 13.1 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 19.9 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 7.2% during 2025 - 2030.
The osteoporosis treatment market has witnessed significant growth due to the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, particularly among the aging population. Osteoporosis, characterized by weakened bones and a higher risk of fractures, is becoming more prevalent globally, driving the demand for effective treatments. The market benefits from advancements in drug therapies and a deeper understanding of bone metabolism, with new drugs offering improved efficacy and safety profiles. As osteoporosis remains a major concern for older adults, particularly postmenopausal women, the market is expected to continue its growth trajectory.
Bisphosphonates Lead the Drug Type Segment
Bisphosphonates dominate the drug type segment of the osteoporosis treatment market due to their proven efficacy in reducing the risk of fractures and slowing bone loss. These drugs, including alendronate and risedronate, work by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, thus helping to maintain bone density. Bisphosphonates have been the first-line treatment for osteoporosis for many years and remain widely prescribed across various healthcare settings.
Despite some side effects such as gastrointestinal discomfort and concerns over long-term use, bisphosphonates continue to be favored by physicians for their effectiveness in reducing fracture risks. The sustained dominance of bisphosphonates is reinforced by their extensive clinical evidence base and their cost-effectiveness compared to newer therapies.
Oral Administration Dominates the Route of Administration
Oral administration is the most common route for osteoporosis treatments, particularly due to patient convenience and the ease of administration. Oral bisphosphonates, such as alendronate and ibandronate, are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis because they offer a straightforward treatment regimen that can be managed by patients at home.
The convenience of oral medications, along with the growing availability of newer oral therapies with improved formulations, contributes to their continued dominance in the market. In addition, oral administration eliminates the need for healthcare professional involvement, making it an attractive option for individuals managing their osteoporosis treatment independently.
Hospitals Are the Largest End-User Segment
Hospitals remain the largest end-user segment in the osteoporosis treatment market, largely due to the management of severe osteoporosis cases and the need for advanced therapies. Hospitals provide comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services for patients, including injectable medications like parathyroid hormone therapies and denosumab, which may require more intensive clinical supervision.
In addition to the administration of oral medications, hospitals often serve as the setting for diagnostic testing, including bone mineral density scans, and for more invasive treatments like surgery in cases of fractures or severe osteoporosis. The ability of hospitals to provide specialized care and access to a broader range of therapies continues to make them a primary choice for osteoporosis patients, particularly those with advanced or complicated conditions.
North America Holds the Largest Market Share
North America leads the osteoporosis treatment market due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis, a well-established healthcare infrastructure, and widespread awareness of bone health. The aging population in North America, particularly in the U.S. and Canada, is a significant driver of demand for osteoporosis treatments. Additionally, North America has access to cutting-edge treatments, including newer biologic drugs and advanced diagnostic techniques, contributing to the region's dominance.
The market in North America is further bolstered by strong healthcare reimbursement systems, allowing patients to access osteoporosis treatments more easily. The presence of major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions also fosters continuous innovation in osteoporosis therapies, solidifying North America’s leadership position in the global market.
Competitive Landscape
The osteoporosis treatment market is competitive, with key players including Eli Lilly and Company, Amgen Inc., Novartis AG, Merck & Co., and Sanofi. These companies focus on developing innovative therapies, particularly injectable biologics and hormone-based treatments, to address the growing demand for more effective osteoporosis management options.
Additionally, companies are investing heavily in research and development to introduce novel therapies with better efficacy and fewer side effects. As the demand for personalized and convenient treatments rises, there is a growing focus on combination therapies, which could further disrupt the market and enhance treatment outcomes for osteoporosis patients.
List of Leading Companies:
- Amgen Inc.
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer Inc.
- Novartis AG
- GlaxoSmithKline plc
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- Radius Health, Inc.
- UCB S.A.
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
- Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Apotex Inc.
Recent Developments:
- Amgen Inc. launched an updated version of its osteoporosis drug Prolia with improved formulation in December 2024.
- Eli Lilly and Company announced clinical trial success for a novel anabolic osteoporosis therapy in November 2024.
- Novartis AG expanded its manufacturing facility to increase the production of osteoporosis treatments in October 2024.
- Radius Health, Inc. collaborated with a leading research institute to develop next-generation osteoporosis drugs in September 2024.
- GlaxoSmithKline plc introduced a patient support program for osteoporosis awareness in August 2024.
Report Scope:
|
Report Features |
Description |
|
Market Size (2024-e) |
USD 13.1 Billion |
|
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 19.9 Billion |
|
CAGR (2025 – 2030) |
7.2% |
|
Base Year for Estimation |
2024-e |
|
Historic Year |
2023 |
|
Forecast Period |
2025 – 2030 |
|
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
|
Segments Covered |
Osteoporosis Treatment Market by Drug Type (Bisphosphonates, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs), Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), Calcitonin, Parathyroid Hormone Therapy, Rank Ligand Inhibitors), by Route of Administration (Oral, Injectable), by End User (Hospitals, Clinics, Homecare Settings, Specialty Pharmacies) |
|
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
|
Major Companies |
Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer Inc., Novartis AG, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Merck & Co., Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Radius Health, Inc., UCB S.A., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Apotex Inc. |
|
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
|
1. Introduction |
|
1.1. Market Definition |
|
1.2. Scope of the Study |
|
1.3. Research Assumptions |
|
1.4. Study Limitations |
|
2. Research Methodology |
|
2.1. Research Approach |
|
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
|
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
|
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
|
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
|
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
|
2.2.2. Primary Research |
|
2.3. Data Mining Process |
|
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
|
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
|
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
|
3. Executive Summary |
|
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
|
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
|
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
|
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
|
4. Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Drug Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
|
4.1. Bisphosphonates |
|
4.2. Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) |
|
4.3. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) |
|
4.4. Calcitonin |
|
4.5. Parathyroid Hormone Therapy |
|
4.6. Rank Ligand Inhibitors |
|
4.7. Others |
|
5. Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Route of Administration (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
|
5.1. Oral |
|
5.2. Injectable |
|
6. Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by End User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
|
6.1. Hospitals |
|
6.2. Clinics |
|
6.3. Homecare Settings |
|
6.4. Specialty Pharmacies |
|
7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
|
7.1. Regional Overview |
|
7.2. North America |
|
7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
|
7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
|
7.2.3. Opportunities |
|
7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
|
7.2.5. Technology Trends |
|
7.2.6. North America Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Drug Type |
|
7.2.7. North America Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Route of Administration |
|
7.2.8. North America Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by End User |
|
7.2.9. By Country |
|
7.2.9.1. US |
|
7.2.9.1.1. US Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Drug Type |
|
7.2.9.1.2. US Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by Route of Administration |
|
7.2.9.1.3. US Osteoporosis Treatment Market, by End User |
|
7.2.9.2. Canada |
|
7.2.9.3. Mexico |
|
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
|
7.3. Europe |
|
7.4. Asia-Pacific |
|
7.5. Latin America |
|
7.6. Middle East & Africa |
|
8. Competitive Landscape |
|
8.1. Overview of the Key Players |
|
8.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
|
8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
|
8.2.2. Market Consolidation |
|
8.2.3. Product Innovation |
|
8.3. Company Share Analysis |
|
8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
|
8.4.1. Strategic Overview |
|
8.4.2. Product Innovations |
|
8.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
|
8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
|
8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
|
8.8. Manufacturing Network |
|
8.8.1. Locations |
|
8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
|
8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
|
8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
|
8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
|
8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
|
8.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
|
8.11. Buying Criteria |
|
9. Company Profiles |
|
9.1. Amgen Inc. |
|
9.1.1. Company Overview |
|
9.1.2. Company Financials |
|
9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
|
9.1.4. Recent Developments |
|
9.1.5. IMR Analysis |
|
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
|
9.2. Eli Lilly and Company |
|
9.3. Pfizer Inc. |
|
9.4. Novartis AG |
|
9.5. GlaxoSmithKline plc |
|
9.6. Merck & Co., Inc. |
|
9.7. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG |
|
9.8. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
|
9.9. Radius Health, Inc. |
|
9.10. UCB S.A. |
|
9.11. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited |
|
9.12. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. |
|
9.13. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
|
9.14. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
9.15. Apotex Inc. |
|
10. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Osteoporosis Treatment Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Osteoporosis Treatment Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
.jpg)
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
- Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
- Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
- Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
- Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments
Market Size Assessment
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Osteoporosis Treatment Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
- Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
- Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
- Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources
.jpg)
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.
NA