Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market By Scrubber Type (Wet Scrubber Systems, Dry Scrubber Systems, Hybrid Scrubber Systems), By Application (Commercial Shipping, Oil Tankers, Passenger Ships, Cargo Ships), By End-User (Shipping Companies, Government & Defense, Private Shipping Fleet Operators), By Technology (Closed Loop Scrubber Systems, Open Loop Scrubber Systems, Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR)), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market was valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 3.0 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 12.4% during 2025 - 2030.

The dry marine scrubber systems market has witnessed substantial growth owing to the increasing emphasis on reducing sulfur emissions from ships and complying with stringent environmental regulations. With the International Maritime Organization (IMO) enforcing more rigorous sulfur emission limits for ships, there has been a significant demand for scrubber systems, particularly dry scrubbers, which help vessels meet these new compliance standards. Dry scrubbers are favored for their efficiency in removing sulfur oxides from exhaust gases without the need for water, making them suitable for regions with limited access to seawater. These systems are a key technology in reducing air pollution from the shipping industry, which is one of the largest contributors to sulfur emissions globally.

The increasing adoption of sustainable shipping practices, coupled with regulatory pressures, has led to a surge in the deployment of dry scrubber systems across different types of ships, including cargo ships, oil tankers, and passenger vessels. Additionally, technological advancements in scrubber systems have made them more efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective. This trend is expected to continue, as governments and maritime operators invest heavily in green technologies to reduce the carbon footprint of their fleets. Dry scrubber systems, with their ability to operate efficiently in a variety of conditions, are poised to become a standard solution for ships aiming to comply with international environmental regulations.

Dry Scrubber Systems Are Largest Owing to Operational Efficiency and Regulatory Compliance

Dry scrubber systems are the largest segment in the marine scrubber market due to their operational efficiency and regulatory compliance benefits. These systems are primarily used on vessels operating in areas with stringent sulfur emission regulations, particularly in regions such as the European Union and North America, where environmental policies are highly enforced. Unlike wet scrubbers, dry scrubbers do not require water to operate, making them ideal for vessels traveling through regions where access to seawater is limited. This makes dry scrubber systems particularly attractive for a wide range of marine vessels, including cargo ships, oil tankers, and passenger ships.

The growing focus on sustainability in the maritime industry, as well as increasing fuel costs and the need to comply with IMO regulations, further boosts the demand for dry scrubber systems. Dry scrubbers use a dry alkaline material, such as calcium hydroxide, to neutralize sulfur oxides in exhaust gases, offering an environmentally friendly solution to sulfur emissions. As the regulatory landscape tightens and shipping companies face greater pressure to reduce their environmental impact, dry scrubber systems are expected to maintain their dominance in the market. These systems provide a cost-effective and reliable means of meeting emission standards, thereby ensuring their widespread adoption across the shipping industry.

 Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market  Size

Commercial Shipping Sector Is Largest Owing to Extensive Fleet Size and Global Trade

The commercial shipping sector is the largest application segment for dry marine scrubber systems, driven by the extensive fleet size and the critical role these vessels play in global trade. Commercial shipping companies operate large fleets of cargo ships and oil tankers, which traverse global shipping routes subject to varying environmental regulations. With the IMO's sulfur cap regulations in place, shipping companies have had to invest in advanced scrubber systems to ensure that their vessels meet the new emission standards. Dry scrubber systems, with their efficiency and effectiveness in sulfur removal, are the preferred choice for these commercial vessels.

As commercial shipping continues to expand with increasing demand for goods across international borders, the need for cost-effective and environmentally compliant technologies becomes more important. The growing importance of meeting regulatory standards while maintaining operational efficiency in the face of fluctuating fuel prices further accelerates the adoption of dry scrubbers. This trend is expected to continue, solidifying the commercial shipping sector as the largest end-user of dry marine scrubber systems.

Closed Loop Scrubber Systems Are Largest Owing to Enhanced Efficiency and Environmental Benefits

Closed loop scrubber systems are the largest technology segment in the dry marine scrubber market, owing to their enhanced efficiency and environmental benefits. Closed loop scrubbers use a continuous circulation system where exhaust gases are passed through an alkaline solution, which neutralizes sulfur oxides before being recirculated. These systems do not discharge water back into the environment, making them ideal for use in ecologically sensitive areas and ensuring compliance with strict environmental regulations. The growing preference for closed loop systems is a result of their ability to provide high removal efficiency while maintaining minimal environmental impact, which is crucial for operators seeking to adhere to IMO regulations.

The increasing focus on environmental protection and sustainability within the maritime industry has led to the rise of closed loop scrubber systems as a popular choice among shipping companies. These systems offer long-term operational benefits, including reduced maintenance costs and a smaller environmental footprint, which have made them an attractive option for vessels operating in emission-controlled areas. As a result, closed loop scrubber systems are expected to maintain their leadership in the market, driven by ongoing regulatory requirements and the need for sustainable practices in the shipping industry.

Asia Pacific Is Fastest Growing Region Owing to Rapid Shipping Industry Growth and Regulatory Pressures

Asia Pacific is the fastest-growing region in the dry marine scrubber systems market, driven by the rapid growth of the shipping industry and increasing regulatory pressures. Countries in this region, particularly China, Japan, and South Korea, are major players in global maritime trade, with large fleets of commercial vessels that are increasingly adopting emission control technologies such as dry scrubbers. The region’s shipping industry is facing mounting pressure to comply with global sulfur emission standards, which has led to a surge in demand for scrubber systems.

As Asia Pacific continues to dominate global trade, the demand for scrubber systems is expected to increase. The region's focus on reducing environmental pollution, coupled with ongoing investments in cleaner technologies, further fuels the adoption of dry scrubbers. The expanding maritime fleets and tightening regulations in key Asian markets make the region the fastest-growing market for dry marine scrubber systems. This trend is likely to continue as countries in Asia Pacific ramp up their efforts to meet international environmental standards.

 Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market  Size by Region 2030

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The dry marine scrubber systems market is competitive, with several key players leading the industry in innovation and technological advancements. Companies such as Wärtsilä Corporation, Alfa Laval, Yara International, and CDRD Marine Technologies are at the forefront of the market, offering a wide range of dry scrubber systems designed to meet the evolving needs of the maritime industry. These companies focus on developing advanced scrubber technologies that are not only compliant with international regulations but also cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

The competitive landscape is shaped by ongoing research and development efforts aimed at improving the efficiency and performance of scrubber systems. Partnerships and collaborations between scrubber manufacturers and shipping companies are common as both parties work together to develop solutions that meet regulatory requirements and enhance operational efficiency. As the demand for green technologies in the maritime industry continues to rise, leading companies are investing in the development of next-generation scrubber systems that offer enhanced capabilities and minimal environmental impact, ensuring they remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Alfa Laval
  • Wärtsilä Corporation
  • Yara International
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
  • MAN Energy Solutions
  • DuPont Clean Technologies
  • Valmet Corporation
  • Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises
  • Samsung Heavy Industries
  • Hyundai Heavy Industries
  • Techcross Inc.
  • Wärtsilä Finland
  • GE Power
  • Japan Marine United Corporation
  • Eimskip

Recent Developments:

  • In December 2024, Alfa Laval launched a new dry scrubber system for reducing sulfur emissions from large commercial shipping vessels.
  • In November 2024, Wärtsilä Corporation announced the development of a hybrid scrubber system for use in mixed fuel environments.
  • In October 2024, Yara International introduced an advanced open-loop scrubber system that complies with international marine emission regulations.
  • In September 2024, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries unveiled an energy-efficient dry scrubber for oil tankers, aimed at reducing operational costs.
  • In August 2024, MAN Energy Solutions expanded its marine scrubber portfolio with a new closed-loop scrubber that offers increased fuel flexibility.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 1.5 billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 3.0 billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

12.4%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market By Scrubber Type (Wet Scrubber Systems, Dry Scrubber Systems, Hybrid Scrubber Systems), By Application (Commercial Shipping, Oil Tankers, Passenger Ships, Cargo Ships), By End-User (Shipping Companies, Government & Defense, Private Shipping Fleet Operators), By Technology (Closed Loop Scrubber Systems, Open Loop Scrubber Systems, Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR))

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Alfa Laval, Wärtsilä Corporation, Yara International, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, MAN Energy Solutions, DuPont Clean Technologies, Valmet Corporation, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Samsung Heavy Industries, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Techcross Inc., Wärtsilä Finland, GE Power, Japan Marine United Corporation, Eimskip

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

Frequently Asked Questions

The Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market was valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2024-e and is expected to grow at a CAGR of over 12.4% from 2025 to 2030.

Tightening environmental regulations regarding sulfur emissions from ships, the need for fuel-efficient systems, and growing global trade are key factors driving the market growth.

Dry scrubbers, wet scrubbers, and hybrid scrubbers are used, with dry scrubbers gaining popularity due to their effectiveness in sulfur emissions reduction.

Dry marine scrubber systems are mainly used in commercial shipping, oil tankers, passenger ships, and cargo ships to comply with sulfur emissions regulations.

Shipping companies, government and defense sectors, and private shipping fleet operators are the key end-users driving demand for these systems.

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Scrubber Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Wet Scrubber Systems

   4.2. Dry Scrubber Systems

   4.3. Hybrid Scrubber Systems

5. Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Commercial Shipping

   5.2. Oil Tankers

   5.3. Passenger Ships

   5.4. Cargo Ships

6. Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Shipping Companies

   6.2. Government & Defense

   6.3. Private Shipping Fleet Operators

7. Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Closed Loop Scrubber Systems

   7.2. Open Loop Scrubber Systems

   7.3. Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR)

   7.4. Others

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Scrubber Type

      8.2.7. North America Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Application

      8.2.8. North America Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by End-User

      8.2.9. North America Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Technology

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Scrubber Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Application

               8.2.10.1.3. US Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by End-User

               8.2.10.1.4. US Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market, by Technology

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. Alfa Laval

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Wärtsilä Corporation

   10.3. Yara International

   10.4. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

   10.5. MAN Energy Solutions

   10.6. DuPont Clean Technologies

   10.7. Valmet Corporation

   10.8. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises

   10.9. Samsung Heavy Industries

   10.10. Hyundai Heavy Industries

   10.11. Techcross Inc.

   10.12. Wärtsilä Finland

   10.13. GE Power

   10.14. Japan Marine United Corporation

   10.15. Eimskip

11. Appendix

 

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market . In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market . The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Dry Marine Scrubber Systems Market . These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options