Wound Closure Devices Market by Product Type (Sutures, Staples, Tissue Adhesives, Wound Closure Strips, Sealants), by Application (Surgical Wounds, Traumatic Wounds, Chronic Wounds), and by End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Clinics, Home Healthcare); Global Insights & Forecast (2024 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Wound Closure Devices Market was valued at USD 5.1 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 7.7 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 6.0% during 2024 - 2030.

The wound closure devices market is a key component of the broader wound care industry, providing critical solutions for effective healing and the prevention of complications. Wound closure devices are essential for treating a range of wounds, from surgical to traumatic and chronic wounds, ensuring proper wound healing and minimizing the risk of infection. The market is driven by advancements in medical technology, an increasing number of surgical procedures, and the rising incidence of trauma-related injuries. The demand for wound closure devices is growing as healthcare providers seek to optimize patient outcomes through more efficient, effective, and less invasive closure methods. With various options such as sutures, staples, tissue adhesives, and sealants available, healthcare professionals can choose the best solution based on the wound type, location, and patient needs.

Sutures Segment is Largest Owing to Traditional and Reliable Application

Among the different types of wound closure devices, sutures represent the largest segment of the market. Sutures have been the gold standard for wound closure for decades and continue to be widely used in both surgical and traumatic wound care due to their versatility, cost-effectiveness, and reliability. Sutures can be applied to a variety of wound types, including those requiring fine, precise closures such as in cosmetic surgeries, as well as larger surgical wounds. Their continued dominance in the market can be attributed to their long-established role in clinical practice and their ability to provide secure and effective wound closure.

While other wound closure methods such as staples and tissue adhesives are gaining popularity, sutures remain the most widely used due to their proven efficacy across a broad range of applications. The growing number of surgeries, particularly in developing regions, continues to drive the demand for sutures as the primary choice for wound closure, keeping the segment as the largest in the market.

Surgical Wounds Segment is Largest Application Owing to Increased Surgical Procedures

In terms of application, surgical wounds represent the largest segment within the wound closure devices market. With the increasing number of surgical procedures being performed worldwide, both elective and emergency, the demand for surgical wound closure devices is on the rise. Surgical wounds are typically created during operations, and their proper closure is essential to minimize complications such as infections, bleeding, and poor healing outcomes. Wound closure devices play a critical role in ensuring that these wounds heal properly, contributing to faster recovery times and reduced post-operative complications.

As surgical procedures become more complex and widespread, especially in fields like orthopedics, cardiovascular surgery, and plastic surgery, the need for advanced and reliable closure devices increases. The demand for products like sutures, staples, and tissue adhesives for surgical wound closure is expected to grow steadily, as more healthcare providers and surgeons seek solutions that offer high performance, ease of use, and minimal risk of complications.

Ambulatory Surgical Centers Segment is Fastest Growing End-Use Industry Owing to Shift Toward Outpatient Care

The ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) segment is the fastest growing in the wound closure devices market. ASCs have gained significant popularity in recent years due to the growing trend of performing surgeries on an outpatient basis. These centers offer lower-cost alternatives to traditional hospitals, enabling patients to undergo surgical procedures and recover in a more convenient and less resource-intensive setting. As ASCs continue to expand, they have become key contributors to the demand for wound closure devices, as many of the surgeries performed in these centers require proper wound management for optimal healing.

The growth of ASCs is supported by the increasing preference for minimally invasive procedures, which often result in smaller surgical wounds that require efficient closure techniques. This has led to a greater adoption of advanced wound closure devices, such as tissue adhesives and sealants, which are well-suited for use in outpatient settings. As the number of ASCs continues to grow globally, particularly in regions like North America and Europe, this segment is expected to remain the fastest-growing in the wound closure devices market.

North America Leads the Market Owing to Advanced Healthcare Infrastructure

North America is the largest region in the wound closure devices market, driven by the presence of advanced healthcare infrastructure, a high volume of surgical procedures, and an increasing focus on patient recovery and outcomes. The United States, in particular, accounts for a significant share of the market due to the widespread use of surgical procedures, particularly elective surgeries, and the availability of advanced medical technologies. The region's healthcare system is well-equipped to support the use of the latest wound closure devices, and healthcare providers are increasingly adopting innovative solutions to improve wound healing and minimize complications.

Additionally, the high level of healthcare spending in North America, coupled with the growing prevalence of chronic diseases and the aging population, is contributing to the expansion of the wound closure devices market. As healthcare providers in North America continue to seek better outcomes for surgical and traumatic wounds, the demand for advanced and reliable wound closure solutions is expected to remain strong, maintaining North America's dominance in the market.

Competitive Landscape and Key Players

The wound closure devices market is highly competitive, with a mix of established players and innovative companies vying for market share. Key players in the market include Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Stryker Corporation, B. Braun Melsungen AG, and Smith & Nephew, which offer a wide range of wound closure products, including sutures, staples, tissue adhesives, and sealants. These companies are focused on innovation and expanding their product portfolios to meet the diverse needs of healthcare providers across various applications.

The competitive landscape is also shaped by the increasing demand for advanced wound closure technologies, such as tissue adhesives and sealants, which offer advantages like reduced procedure time, minimal scarring, and faster healing. Additionally, companies are investing in research and development to create new, more effective wound closure solutions, such as bio-absorbable sutures and advanced polymer-based adhesives. Strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and technological advancements are key strategies that companies are employing to strengthen their position in the market and cater to the evolving needs of the healthcare industry.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Medtronic PLC
  • Smith & Nephew
  • 3M Company
  • B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • Integra LifeSciences
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • ConvaTec Group
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson)
  • Surgical Specialties Corporation
  • Cardinal Health
  • CryoLife Inc.
  • Advanced Medical Solutions Group plc
  • Tissuemed Ltd.

 

Recent Developments:

  • Medtronic PLC launched a new line of advanced tissue sealants to enhance wound closure during minimally invasive surgeries.
  • 3M Company introduced a new suturing device that improves wound healing and reduces complications in post-surgical patients.
  • Johnson & Johnson received FDA approval for its novel wound closure strip that offers faster healing and reduced infection rates.
  • Integra LifeSciences expanded its product offerings by acquiring a leading supplier of biodegradable wound closure products.
  • Surgical Specialties Corporation partnered with major hospitals to introduce its new line of tissue adhesives, reducing patient recovery time.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2023)

USD 5.1 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 7.7 Billion

CAGR (2024 – 2030)

6.0%

Base Year for Estimation

2023

Historic Year

2022

Forecast Period

2024 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Wound Closure Devices Market by Product Type (Sutures, Staples, Tissue Adhesives, Wound Closure Strips, Sealants), by Application (Surgical Wounds, Traumatic Wounds, Chronic Wounds), and by End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Clinics, Home Healthcare)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic PLC, Smith & Nephew, 3M Company, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Integra LifeSciences, ConvaTec Group, Abbott Laboratories, Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), Surgical Specialties Corporation, Cardinal Health, CryoLife Inc., Tissuemed Ltd.

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   4.1. Sutures

   4.2. Staples

   4.3. Tissue Adhesives

   4.4. Wound Closure Strips

   4.5. Sealants

5. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   5.1. Surgical Wounds

   5.2. Traumatic Wounds

   5.3. Chronic Wounds

6. Wound Closure Devices Market, by End-Use Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   6.1. Hospitals

   6.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

   6.3. Others

7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   7.1. Regional Overview

   7.2. North America

      7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      7.2.3. Opportunities

      7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      7.2.5. Technology Trends

      7.2.6. North America Wound Closure Devices Market, by Product Type

      7.2.7. North America Wound Closure Devices Market, by Application

      7.2.8. North America Wound Closure Devices Market, by End-Use Industry

      7.2.9. By Country

         7.2.9.1. US

               7.2.9.1.1. US Wound Closure Devices Market, by Product Type

               7.2.9.1.2. US Wound Closure Devices Market, by Application

               7.2.9.1.3. US Wound Closure Devices Market, by End-Use Industry

         7.2.9.2. Canada

         7.2.9.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   7.3. Europe

   7.4. Asia-Pacific

   7.5. Latin America

   7.6. Middle East & Africa

8. Competitive Landscape

   8.1. Overview of the Key Players

   8.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      8.2.2. Market Consolidation

      8.2.3. Product Innovation

   8.3. Company Share Analysis

   8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      8.4.1. Strategic Overview

      8.4.2. Product Innovations

   8.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   8.8. Manufacturing Network

      8.8.1. Locations

      8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   8.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   8.11. Buying Criteria

9. Company Profiles

   9.1. Johnson & Johnson

      9.1.1. Company Overview

      9.1.2. Company Financials

      9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      9.1.4. Recent Developments

      9.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   9.2. Medtronic PLC

   9.3. Smith & Nephew

   9.4. 3M Company

   9.5. B. Braun Melsungen AG

   9.6. Integra LifeSciences

   9.7. Zimmer Biomet

   9.8. ConvaTec Group

   9.9. Abbott Laboratories

   9.10. Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson)

   9.11. Surgical Specialties Corporation

   9.12. Cardinal Health

   9.13. CryoLife Inc.

   9.14. Advanced Medical Solutions Group plc

   9.15. Tissuemed Ltd.

10. Appendix

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Wound Closure Devices Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Wound Closure Devices Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Wound Closure Devices Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.


I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options