As per Intent Market Research, the Visceral Pain Treatment Market was valued at USD 4.8 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 17.0 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 23.4% during 2025 - 2030.
The visceral pain treatment market is evolving rapidly due to the rising prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders, abdominal pain, and pelvic pain among the global population. Visceral pain, which arises from the internal organs, can be particularly challenging to treat due to its complex nature and varying causes, including inflammation, infections, and dysfunction of the organs. The increasing awareness of chronic pain conditions and advancements in medical technology are driving the demand for effective treatment options. This market is characterized by a wide range of treatment modalities, from pharmaceuticals and medical devices to non-pharmacological treatments, aimed at providing relief and improving the quality of life for patients suffering from visceral pain.
The market for visceral pain treatment is growing as healthcare providers focus on improving pain management strategies. With a variety of pain types to address, including gastrointestinal, abdominal, and pelvic pain, there is a growing need for tailored solutions that cater to specific conditions. The pharmaceutical industry, along with medical device manufacturers, is responding to these needs by developing innovative therapies and technologies that provide more targeted and effective relief. The demand for effective visceral pain treatments is expected to rise further as awareness increases and more research is conducted to better understand the mechanisms behind visceral pain.
Pharmaceuticals Segment is Largest Due to Widespread Use in Pain Management
The pharmaceuticals segment is the largest within the visceral pain treatment market, owing to the widespread use of medications for managing visceral pain. Drugs such as analgesics, opioids, and anti-inflammatory medications are commonly prescribed to provide relief from gastrointestinal, abdominal, and pelvic pain. Pharmaceutical treatments remain the primary approach for most patients as they offer convenience and can be tailored to the severity and specific nature of the pain. In addition to conventional pain relievers, newer classes of drugs, such as nerve-targeting medications and biologics, are also gaining traction for their ability to provide more effective and sustained relief for chronic visceral pain conditions.
The pharmaceuticals segment continues to dominate due to its accessibility and the continued development of novel pain management drugs. As pain management becomes more specialized, pharmaceutical companies are investing in research to create drugs that target the underlying causes of visceral pain, rather than just masking the symptoms. With the increasing recognition of the need for effective pain control, especially in chronic and debilitating conditions, the pharmaceuticals segment is expected to continue to lead the market, catering to a wide range of therapeutic needs across different visceral pain types.
Non-Pharmacological Treatments Segment is Fastest Growing Due to Rising Demand for Alternative Therapies
The non-pharmacological treatments segment is the fastest-growing within the visceral pain treatment market, driven by an increasing preference for alternative therapies and a growing focus on holistic pain management. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as physical therapy, acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and biofeedback, are gaining popularity due to their ability to manage pain without the potential side effects associated with pharmaceuticals. Many patients with chronic visceral pain conditions are seeking alternatives to medications, particularly due to concerns about the long-term use of opioids and other drugs.
The demand for non-pharmacological treatments is particularly high in the management of abdominal and pelvic pain, where lifestyle changes, stress management, and relaxation techniques have shown to be effective. As healthcare systems and patients look for more sustainable and less invasive treatments, the non-pharmacological treatments segment is rapidly expanding. This shift toward integrative care is likely to continue as evidence grows supporting the effectiveness of non-drug interventions in managing chronic pain, further boosting the growth of this segment.
Gastrointestinal Pain Segment is Largest Application Due to High Prevalence of Related Conditions
The gastrointestinal pain segment is the largest application within the visceral pain treatment market, primarily due to the high prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These conditions often lead to chronic gastrointestinal pain, which can significantly impact the patient's quality of life. The rising incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, along with the increasing awareness of their management, has contributed to the growth of this segment.
Effective management of gastrointestinal pain requires a multi-faceted approach, including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and non-pharmacological treatments. The high demand for treatment solutions is driven by the need for more targeted therapies to address the complex mechanisms behind gastrointestinal pain. As the global burden of gastrointestinal diseases continues to rise, the demand for effective treatments for gastrointestinal pain is expected to remain strong, positioning this segment as the largest in the market.
Hospitals Segment is Largest End-Use Industry Due to High Patient Volume and Advanced Treatment Options
The hospitals segment is the largest end-use industry in the visceral pain treatment market, driven by the high volume of patients seeking medical care for chronic and acute visceral pain conditions. Hospitals offer a wide range of diagnostic tools and treatment options, including advanced pharmaceutical therapies, medical devices, and non-pharmacological treatments. The availability of comprehensive healthcare services, such as emergency care, specialized pain management units, and surgical interventions, makes hospitals the primary setting for the management of visceral pain.
The hospital environment is crucial for providing advanced care, particularly for patients with complex or severe pain conditions that require multi-disciplinary approaches. In addition, hospitals are increasingly investing in cutting-edge pain management technologies and therapies to improve patient outcomes. As the demand for specialized care and effective pain management continues to grow, hospitals will remain the dominant end-use industry in the market.
North America is Largest Region Owing to Advanced Healthcare Infrastructure and Rising Pain Prevalence
North America is the largest region in the visceral pain treatment market, driven by its advanced healthcare infrastructure, high healthcare expenditure, and the rising prevalence of chronic pain conditions. The United States, in particular, has a large number of patients suffering from visceral pain due to a high incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, and related comorbidities. The region also benefits from a strong focus on research and development, leading to the rapid adoption of innovative treatments and technologies.
North America’s well-established healthcare system, coupled with increasing awareness of visceral pain management, supports the strong growth of this market in the region. Additionally, regulatory approval and reimbursement policies in the U.S. and Canada facilitate the widespread availability and adoption of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological treatments. With continued advancements in medical technology and a growing emphasis on patient-centric care, North America is expected to maintain its leadership in the market.
Competitive Landscape
The visceral pain treatment market is highly competitive, with key players focusing on the development of advanced treatments to address the growing need for effective pain management. Prominent companies in this market include Pfizer, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. These companies are leveraging their extensive research and development capabilities to create innovative pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and non-pharmacological treatments.
The market is witnessing a rise in strategic partnerships and collaborations, as well as the integration of digital technologies and telemedicine platforms to enhance treatment accessibility and patient outcomes. As the demand for effective, long-term solutions for visceral pain grows, companies are focusing on expanding their product portfolios to meet the diverse needs of patients. The competitive landscape is expected to remain dynamic as market players continue to innovate and improve pain management strategies for gastrointestinal, abdominal, and pelvic pain.
Recent Developments:
- Pfizer Inc. launched a new analgesic treatment for visceral pain, improving pain relief options for patients with chronic abdominal conditions.
- Abbott Laboratories received regulatory approval for its novel device for managing pelvic pain, offering a non-invasive treatment alternative.
- Johnson & Johnson expanded its portfolio of gastrointestinal pain medications with the release of a new opioid-free pain relief drug.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. announced the introduction of a new pain management therapy specifically for visceral organ pain, targeting patients with chronic pain syndromes.
- Bristol-Myers Squibb entered a partnership to advance the development of a drug aimed at treating severe visceral pain related to inflammatory bowel disease.
List of Leading Companies:
- Pfizer Inc.
- Johnson & Johnson
- Novartis AG
- Eli Lilly and Co.
- Abbott Laboratories
- Sanofi S.A.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- GlaxoSmithKline plc
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- Endo International plc
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Astellas Pharma Inc.
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Report Scope:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2024-e) |
USD 4.8 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 17.0 Billion |
CAGR (2025 – 2030) |
23.4% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2024-e |
Historic Year |
2023 |
Forecast Period |
2025 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Global Visceral Pain Treatment Market by Treatment Type (Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, Non-Pharmacological Treatments), by Application (Gastrointestinal Pain, Abdominal Pain, Pelvic Pain), by End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Novartis AG, Eli Lilly and Co., Abbott Laboratories, Sanofi S.A., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Endo International plc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Treatment Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
4.1. Pharmaceuticals |
4.2. Medical Devices |
4.3. Non-Pharmacological Treatments |
5. Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
5.1. Gastrointestinal Pain |
5.2. Abdominal Pain |
5.3. Pelvic Pain |
5.4. Others |
6. Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by End-Use Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
6.1. Hospitals |
6.2. Clinics |
6.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers |
7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
7.1. Regional Overview |
7.2. North America |
7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
7.2.3. Opportunities |
7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
7.2.5. Technology Trends |
7.2.6. North America Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Treatment Type |
7.2.7. North America Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Application |
7.2.8. North America Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by End-Use Industry |
7.2.9. By Country |
7.2.9.1. US |
7.2.9.1.1. US Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Treatment Type |
7.2.9.1.2. US Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by Application |
7.2.9.1.3. US Visceral Pain Treatment Market, by End-Use Industry |
7.2.9.2. Canada |
7.2.9.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
7.3. Europe |
7.4. Asia-Pacific |
7.5. Latin America |
7.6. Middle East & Africa |
8. Competitive Landscape |
8.1. Overview of the Key Players |
8.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
8.2.2. Market Consolidation |
8.2.3. Product Innovation |
8.3. Company Share Analysis |
8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
8.4.1. Strategic Overview |
8.4.2. Product Innovations |
8.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
8.8. Manufacturing Network |
8.8.1. Locations |
8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
8.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
8.11. Buying Criteria |
9. Company Profiles |
9.1. Pfizer Inc. |
9.1.1. Company Overview |
9.1.2. Company Financials |
9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
9.1.4. Recent Developments |
9.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
9.2. Johnson & Johnson |
9.3. Novartis AG |
9.4. Eli Lilly and Co. |
9.5. Abbott Laboratories |
9.6. Sanofi S.A. |
9.7. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
9.8. GlaxoSmithKline plc |
9.9. Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals |
9.10. Merck & Co., Inc. |
9.11. Endo International plc |
9.12. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited |
9.13. Boehringer Ingelheim |
9.14. Astellas Pharma Inc. |
9.15. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company |
10. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Visceral Pain Treatment Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Visceral Pain Treatment Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
- Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
- Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
- Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
- Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments
Market Size Assessment
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Visceral Pain Treatment Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
- Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
- Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
- Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.
NA