Vascular Closure Devices Market By Type (Active Closure Devices, Passive Closure Devices, Bioabsorbable Devices), By Procedure Type (Arterial Closure, Venous Closure), By Material (Stainless Steel, Polymer-based Materials, Titanium), By End-Use (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Clinics), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Vascular Closure Devices Market was valued at USD 1.9 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 3.9 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 12.3% during 2025 - 2030.

The vascular closure devices market is experiencing significant growth, driven by advancements in medical technology aimed at enhancing patient recovery and improving procedural outcomes in vascular procedures. Vascular closure devices are used to seal blood vessels after interventions such as catheterization, angioplasty, or other minimally invasive procedures, helping to reduce complications and improve recovery times. The demand for these devices is increasing as healthcare providers seek safer and more efficient ways to close puncture sites and prevent bleeding post-surgery.

The growing adoption of minimally invasive procedures, rising cardiovascular disease prevalence, and advancements in vascular closure technology are key drivers propelling the market forward. As the healthcare industry continues to prioritize patient recovery and efficiency in medical procedures, the vascular closure devices market is positioned for sustained growth, particularly with the development of innovative devices that offer faster recovery, reduced complications, and improved patient outcomes.

Active Closure Devices Are the Largest Segment Owing to Their Efficiency and Immediate Results

Active closure devices represent the largest segment in the vascular closure devices market, driven by their efficiency and ability to provide immediate closure results. These devices typically employ mechanical, hemostatic, or suture-based mechanisms to achieve rapid hemostasis, making them ideal for high-pressure arterial punctures and other vascular procedures. Active closure devices are particularly advantageous in settings that require quick closure, such as during cardiac catheterization or interventional radiology procedures.

The popularity of active closure devices is also fueled by their ability to minimize complications like hematoma formation and improve patient recovery times. Their widespread adoption in hospitals, where fast patient turnover and procedural efficiency are essential, positions active closure devices as a key player in the vascular closure market. With continuous advancements in device design and functionality, active closure devices are expected to remain the dominant technology in the sector.

Arterial Closure Procedures Are the Largest Segment Owing to the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Interventions

Arterial closure procedures are the largest procedure type segment in the vascular closure devices market, primarily due to the high prevalence of cardiovascular interventions that require arterial access. Procedures such as angioplasty, catheterization, and stent placement often involve arterial punctures, necessitating reliable closure methods to prevent bleeding and promote rapid healing. As cardiovascular disease remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the demand for arterial closure devices has surged.

The need for precision and safety in arterial closure procedures has driven the adoption of advanced vascular closure devices, particularly those designed for use in high-risk cardiovascular interventions. The growing number of patients undergoing arterial procedures is expected to sustain the demand for these devices, with arterial closure devices continuing to dominate the market due to their critical role in ensuring patient safety and minimizing procedural complications.

Polymer-Based Materials Are the Fastest Growing Segment Owing to Their Biocompatibility and Versatility

Polymer-based materials are the fastest-growing material segment in the vascular closure devices market, driven by their biocompatibility, flexibility, and ease of integration into various device designs. Polymer-based materials, such as biodegradable polymers, offer significant advantages in vascular closure, as they are highly compatible with human tissues and can be designed to dissolve over time, reducing the risk of long-term complications. This characteristic makes them ideal for use in bioabsorbable devices, which are becoming increasingly popular in vascular procedures.

The demand for polymer-based materials is growing as healthcare providers seek innovative solutions that offer enhanced safety, reduced risk of infection, and improved patient outcomes. As research into advanced polymers continues to evolve, the use of polymer-based materials in vascular closure devices is expected to expand, further driving market growth. The versatility and customization options offered by polymer-based materials make them a key focus for manufacturers aiming to improve device functionality and patient satisfaction.

Hospitals Are the Largest End-Use Industry Owing to High Patient Volume and Advanced Treatment Capabilities

Hospitals are the largest end-use industry in the vascular closure devices market, owing to their high patient volume and the need for advanced treatment capabilities. Hospitals are the primary settings for invasive vascular procedures such as catheterization, angioplasty, and other interventions, making them the largest consumers of vascular closure devices. The availability of skilled medical staff and specialized equipment in hospitals makes them ideal environments for the use of these devices, particularly in high-risk procedures requiring precision and rapid recovery.

The demand for vascular closure devices in hospitals is driven by the need to improve patient outcomes, reduce recovery times, and enhance procedural efficiency. With the continued growth in cardiovascular procedures and the increasing focus on minimally invasive surgeries, hospitals will continue to dominate the market as the largest end-use sector for vascular closure devices.

North America Leads the Market Owing to High Demand for Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

North America holds the largest share in the vascular closure devices market, primarily driven by the region’s advanced healthcare infrastructure and high demand for minimally invasive surgical procedures. The United States, in particular, is a key contributor to the market, with a significant volume of vascular surgeries and a growing focus on improving patient outcomes with less invasive techniques. Vascular closure devices, which offer quicker recovery times and reduced complications, have become increasingly popular in hospitals and surgical centers across the region.

Furthermore, the high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, coupled with ongoing advancements in medical technologies, has boosted the adoption of vascular closure devices. The region’s strong regulatory environment, including FDA approvals for new and improved devices, ensures that North America will continue to be the leader in the vascular closure devices market.

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The vascular closure devices market is highly competitive, with numerous players focusing on the development of innovative devices that meet the growing demand for safer, faster, and more effective closure solutions. Leading companies such as Abbott Laboratories, Terumo Corporation, and Medtronic are at the forefront of this market, offering a range of vascular closure devices designed to address various procedural needs. These companies are continually advancing their product offerings through research and development, focusing on improving the performance, safety, and ease of use of their devices.

The competitive landscape is characterized by technological innovation, with companies striving to enhance device efficacy and minimize complications associated with vascular closure. Partnerships and collaborations between medical device manufacturers, healthcare providers, and research institutions are also driving innovation in the sector. As the market continues to grow, companies that prioritize patient safety, efficiency, and product differentiation will be best positioned to maintain a competitive edge in the vascular closure devices market.

Recent Developments:

  • In December 2024, Abbott Laboratories launched a new generation of vascular closure devices that offer faster recovery times. The device aims to improve patient outcomes in both arterial and venous procedures.
  • In November 2024, Medtronic expanded its vascular closure portfolio with the addition of bioabsorbable devices. These devices are designed for patients requiring less invasive, faster healing options post-surgery.
  • In October 2024, Boston Scientific announced a strategic partnership with a leading vascular surgical center to enhance the adoption of their latest vascular closure devices. This collaboration aims to address market demand for safer, minimally invasive solutions.
  • In September 2024, Johnson & Johnson introduced a new passive closure device aimed at improving blood flow and minimizing complications in arterial surgeries. The device offers enhanced precision and faster hemostasis.
  • In August 2024, AngioDynamics acquired a vascular closure device technology company to strengthen its position in the vascular closure market. This acquisition will help expand the company's product offerings and market reach.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Terumo Corporation
  • Cardinal Health
  • Medtronic
  • Vascular Solutions
  • Boston Scientific
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Endologix
  • Merit Medical
  • AngioDynamics
  • Cook Medical
  • Phillips Healthcare
  • Teleflex
  • Biotronik
  • Acelity

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 1.9 billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 3.9 billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

12.3%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Vascular Closure Devices Market By Type (Active Closure Devices, Passive Closure Devices, Bioabsorbable Devices), By Procedure Type (Arterial Closure, Venous Closure), By Material (Stainless Steel, Polymer-based Materials, Titanium), By End-Use (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Clinics)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Abbott Laboratories, Terumo Corporation, Cardinal Health, Medtronic, Vascular Solutions, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Endologix, Merit Medical, AngioDynamics, Cook Medical, Phillips Healthcare, Teleflex, Biotronik, Acelity

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Active Closure Devices

   4.2. Passive Closure Devices

   4.3. Bioabsorbable Devices

   4.4. Others

5. Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Procedure Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Arterial Closure

   5.2. Venous Closure

   5.3. Others

6. Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Material (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Stainless Steel

   6.2. Polymer-based Materials

   6.3. Titanium

   6.4. Others

7. Vascular Closure Devices Market, by End-Use (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Hospitals

   7.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

   7.3. Clinics

   7.4. Others

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Type

      8.2.7. North America Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Procedure Type

      8.2.8. North America Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Material

      8.2.9. North America Vascular Closure Devices Market, by End-Use

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Procedure Type

               8.2.10.1.3. US Vascular Closure Devices Market, by Material

               8.2.10.1.4. US Vascular Closure Devices Market, by End-Use

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. Abbott Laboratories

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Terumo Corporation

   10.3. Cardinal Health

   10.4. Medtronic

   10.5. Vascular Solutions

   10.6. Boston Scientific

   10.7. Johnson & Johnson

   10.8. Endologix

   10.9. Merit Medical

   10.10. AngioDynamics

   10.11. Cook Medical

   10.12. Phillips Healthcare

   10.13. Teleflex

   10.14. Biotronik

   10.15. Acelity

11. Appendix

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Vascular Closure Devices Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Vascular Closure Devices Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Vascular Closure Devices Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options