As per Intent Market Research, the Urolithiasis Management Devices Market was valued at USD 3.0 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 4.8 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 8.4% during 2025 - 2030.
Urolithiasis, the condition of having kidney stones or bladder stones, is one of the most common urinary tract disorders affecting millions of people globally. Effective management of urolithiasis is crucial for preventing complications like infection, urinary tract obstruction, and kidney damage. The market for urolithiasis management devices is expanding due to an increase in the prevalence of kidney and bladder stones, particularly in regions with high rates of obesity, dehydration, and dietary factors. These devices play a critical role in non-invasive and minimally invasive treatment methods, improving patient outcomes by efficiently managing stone removal and fragmentation. The increasing awareness of stone-related diseases and technological advancements in urolithiasis management are propelling the market forward.
The primary devices used for the management of urolithiasis include Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), Ureteroscopy, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). These devices aim to break down stones or facilitate their removal, reducing the need for more invasive surgical procedures. The market is categorized based on the type of device, application, and end-use industry. Hospitals, clinics, and ambulatory surgical centers are the primary end-users of these devices. Advancements in minimally invasive technologies and the rising number of patients seeking less painful treatment options are driving the growth of this market.
ESWL is Largest Segment Due to Non-Invasive Nature
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) is the largest segment in the urolithiasis management devices market, primarily due to its non-invasive nature and effectiveness in treating kidney stones. ESWL uses focused shock waves to break kidney stones into smaller fragments, which can then be passed out of the body through the urinary tract. This method is preferred by both healthcare providers and patients because it does not require any incisions, reducing the risk of infection and recovery time. It is particularly effective for smaller to medium-sized stones located in the kidney or upper urinary tract, making it a first-line treatment option in many clinical settings.
The non-invasive nature of ESWL has made it highly popular, especially in developed countries where advanced healthcare technologies are more accessible. It is cost-effective, reduces the need for extended hospital stays, and allows patients to resume normal activities relatively quickly. As the global incidence of kidney stones rises, ESWL is expected to maintain its dominant position in the market, with a growing number of hospitals and clinics adopting it as their preferred treatment method for urolithiasis.
Ureteroscopy is Fastest Growing Segment Due to Advancements in Technology
Ureteroscopy is the fastest growing segment in the urolithiasis management devices market, driven by advancements in technology and its ability to treat stones located in the lower urinary tract, including the bladder and ureter. Ureteroscopy involves the insertion of a thin, flexible tube with a camera to directly visualize the stone and remove it either through fragmentation or retrieval. This method is minimally invasive, allowing patients to recover quickly with reduced pain compared to traditional surgical procedures. Ureteroscopy is especially beneficial for treating larger stones or stones that are difficult to reach with non-invasive methods like ESWL.
The increasing adoption of flexible ureteroscopes, which provide enhanced visualization and precision, is fueling the growth of this segment. Additionally, ureteroscopy is being increasingly used in outpatient settings due to its reduced recovery time and ability to treat a variety of stone sizes. As more hospitals and clinics invest in state-of-the-art ureteroscopy equipment, the segment is expected to continue its rapid growth, driven by its efficiency and the demand for minimally invasive treatment options for urolithiasis.
Hospitals Are Largest End-Use Industry Due to High Patient Volume
Hospitals are the largest end-use industry for urolithiasis management devices, due to their capacity to handle a high volume of patients requiring treatment for kidney and bladder stones. Hospitals are equipped with the necessary infrastructure, including advanced diagnostic tools, surgical theaters, and specialized medical teams, to perform procedures like ESWL, ureteroscopy, and PCNL. As urolithiasis is a common condition that affects millions worldwide, hospitals play a central role in providing treatment to patients suffering from stone-related disorders.
Hospitals also offer a broader range of treatment options, including advanced therapies for complex cases, such as large or impacted stones. With the growing number of individuals seeking medical care for stone diseases, hospitals are likely to remain the dominant end-user segment in the urolithiasis management devices market. Moreover, the continuous development of minimally invasive techniques in hospital settings is expected to further bolster the adoption of devices like ESWL and ureteroscopy, ensuring that hospitals continue to drive the largest share of the market.
North America Is Largest Region Due to Advanced Healthcare Systems
North America is the largest region in the urolithiasis management devices market, primarily due to its advanced healthcare infrastructure, high healthcare spending, and widespread access to cutting-edge medical technologies. The United States and Canada are key contributors to the region’s dominance, with a high rate of urolithiasis diagnosis and treatment. The region also benefits from strong healthcare policies and a well-established reimbursement system that supports the adoption of advanced medical devices, including those used for the treatment of kidney and bladder stones.
North America has seen significant investments in the development of minimally invasive technologies, such as advanced ESWL systems and flexible ureteroscopes, which have become the gold standard in urolithiasis management. As the incidence of kidney stones continues to rise due to factors such as diet, obesity, and lifestyle, North America’s healthcare system is well-positioned to meet the growing demand for effective stone management treatments. The region’s market leadership is expected to continue, supported by ongoing technological advancements and the continued adoption of non-invasive treatments for urolithiasis.
Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape
The urolithiasis management devices market is competitive, with key players such as Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Olympus Corporation, Medtronic, and Conmed Corporation leading the way. These companies are at the forefront of developing and manufacturing advanced devices for the treatment of kidney and bladder stones.
The competitive landscape is shaped by continuous innovation in device technology, with a focus on improving the safety, efficiency, and patient comfort of urolithiasis management procedures. Leading companies are investing in research and development to create new, minimally invasive solutions, such as advanced ureteroscopy systems and more efficient shockwave lithotripters. Additionally, strategic partnerships and acquisitions are common in the market as companies aim to expand their product portfolios and enhance their market share. As demand for less invasive treatments grows, competition in the urolithiasis management devices market is expected to intensify, driving further innovation and improvement in patient care.
Recent Developments:
- Boston Scientific introduced an advanced ureteroscope with enhanced visualization and flexibility for kidney stone treatment.
- Olympus launched a new line of single-use nephroscopes, emphasizing infection control and precision.
- Karl Storz announced a strategic partnership with a urology-focused research institute to develop next-gen lithotripsy devices.
- Cook Medical expanded its portfolio with innovative stone removal baskets designed for enhanced maneuverability.
- Richard Wolf GmbH unveiled an upgraded lithotripter with AI-powered energy modulation for precise kidney stone targeting.
List of Leading Companies:
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
- Medtronic plc
- Siemens Healthineers
- Cook Medical
- Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
- Teleflex Incorporated
- Stryker Corporation
- ConvaTec Group Plc
- Olympus Corporation
- Urotech Medical Ltd.
- Richard Wolf GmbH
- B. Braun Melsungen AG
- Hoya Corporation
- Shree Umiya Industries
Report Scope:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2024-e) |
USD 3.0 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 4.8 Billion |
CAGR (2025 – 2030) |
8.4% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2024-e |
Historic Year |
2023 |
Forecast Period |
2025 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Urolithiasis Management Devices Market by Type (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy), by Application (Kidney Stones, Bladder Stones), by End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers), and by Region |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Medtronic plc, Siemens Healthineers, Cook Medical, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, Stryker Corporation, ConvaTec Group Plc, Olympus Corporation, Urotech Medical Ltd., Richard Wolf GmbH, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Shree Umiya Industries |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
4.1. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) |
4.2. Ureteroscopy |
4.3. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) |
5. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
5.1. Kidney Stones |
5.2. Bladder Stones |
6. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by End-Use Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
6.1. Hospitals |
6.2. Clinics |
6.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers |
7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
7.1. Regional Overview |
7.2. North America |
7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
7.2.3. Opportunities |
7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
7.2.5. Technology Trends |
7.2.6. North America Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Type |
7.2.7. North America Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Application |
7.2.8. North America Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by End-Use Industry |
7.2.9. By Country |
7.2.9.1. US |
7.2.9.1.1. US Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Type |
7.2.9.1.2. US Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by Application |
7.2.9.1.3. US Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, by End-Use Industry |
7.2.9.2. Canada |
7.2.9.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
7.3. Europe |
7.4. Asia-Pacific |
7.5. Latin America |
7.6. Middle East & Africa |
8. Competitive Landscape |
8.1. Overview of the Key Players |
8.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
8.2.2. Market Consolidation |
8.2.3. Product Innovation |
8.3. Company Share Analysis |
8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
8.4.1. Strategic Overview |
8.4.2. Product Innovations |
8.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
8.8. Manufacturing Network |
8.8.1. Locations |
8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
8.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
8.11. Buying Criteria |
9. Company Profiles |
9.1. Boston Scientific Corporation |
9.1.1. Company Overview |
9.1.2. Company Financials |
9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
9.1.4. Recent Developments |
9.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
9.2. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. |
9.3. Medtronic plc |
9.4. Siemens Healthineers |
9.5. Cook Medical |
9.6. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA |
9.7. Teleflex Incorporated |
9.8. Stryker Corporation |
9.9. ConvaTec Group Plc |
9.10. Olympus Corporation |
9.11. Urotech Medical Ltd. |
9.12. Richard Wolf GmbH |
9.13. B. Braun Melsungen AG |
9.14. Hoya Corporation |
9.15. Shree Umiya Industries |
10. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Urolithiasis Management Devices Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Urolithiasis Management Devices Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
- Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
- Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
- Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
- Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments
Market Size Assessment
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Urolithiasis Management Devices Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
- Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
- Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
- Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.
NA