As per Intent Market Research, the Stretch Marks Treatment Market was valued at USD 2.6 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 6.0 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 15.2% during 2025-2030.
The global stretch marks treatment market has been experiencing steady growth due to an increase in the number of individuals seeking solutions for skin concerns related to pregnancy, rapid weight changes, and certain medical conditions. Stretch marks, a common cosmetic issue, are largely caused by the tearing of skin layers due to sudden stretching, and they often appear during pregnancy, puberty, or significant weight fluctuations. As a result, consumers are turning to various treatment methods, ranging from topical solutions to more advanced procedures like laser therapy. The market's expansion is also driven by a growing demand for effective and non-invasive treatments, along with increasing awareness about skincare options.
With advancements in technology and the development of innovative treatments, the market is poised for significant growth over the next few years. Product types, treatment methods, and distribution channels are rapidly evolving to meet the diverse needs of consumers, with a strong focus on improving treatment efficacy and consumer accessibility. The rising popularity of cosmetic dermatology, coupled with technological innovations, is expected to drive the expansion of this market globally.
Product Type Segment is Largest Owing to Topical Creams and Ointments
The product type segment in the stretch marks treatment market is characterized by a wide range of offerings, with topical creams and ointments emerging as the largest subsegment. These products have long been the go-to treatment for individuals looking to reduce the appearance of stretch marks. They are widely available, easy to use, and can be applied in the comfort of one’s home, making them highly accessible to consumers. Topical treatments, such as creams, oils, and gels, often contain active ingredients like retinoids, hyaluronic acid, and peptides, which are designed to improve skin elasticity and promote collagen production, helping to minimize the visibility of stretch marks.
The growing preference for non-invasive and cost-effective solutions has fueled the dominance of topical creams and ointments in this market. Additionally, brands are increasingly introducing specialized formulations to address specific skin types and conditions, further boosting their popularity. With consumers increasingly focusing on self-care and dermatological solutions that can be used at home, this subsegment is expected to maintain its position as the dominant product type in the stretch marks treatment market.
Treatment Type Segment is Fastest Growing Owing to Over-the-Counter Treatments
The treatment type segment in the stretch marks treatment market is divided into prescription-based treatments and over-the-counter (OTC) treatments. Over-the-counter treatments have emerged as the fastest-growing subsegment due to their increased accessibility and affordability. OTC options, such as creams, gels, and oils, are easily available at pharmacies, supermarkets, and online platforms without the need for a doctor’s prescription. These treatments offer consumers convenience, allowing them to manage stretch marks in the comfort of their own homes.
The growing preference for OTC treatments can also be attributed to the rise in self-care and wellness trends, as more consumers seek effective skincare products that do not require a healthcare professional’s involvement. Additionally, advancements in product formulations, such as the inclusion of natural and organic ingredients, have contributed to the rapid growth of OTC treatments. As awareness of available OTC options increases, the demand for these treatments is expected to continue rising, making them a key driver of the market's growth.
End-Use Segment is Largest Owing to Homecare
In the end-use segment of the stretch marks treatment market, homecare is the largest subsegment. Consumers increasingly prefer to manage their skin concerns, including stretch marks, in the comfort and privacy of their own homes. Homecare treatments, particularly those involving topical creams, oils, and lotions, are favored for their convenience, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use. Additionally, the growing availability of DIY treatments and home-use devices has further propelled the homecare segment.
As self-care and at-home beauty regimens continue to gain traction, the homecare subsegment is expected to maintain its dominance. The market is seeing a rise in products designed specifically for home use, such as easy-to-apply stretch mark creams and oils that promise visible results with regular use. The growing focus on personal wellness and beauty routines has led to a surge in demand for homecare solutions, making it the largest end-use segment in the stretch marks treatment market.
Distribution Channel Segment is Fastest Growing Owing to Online Retail
The distribution channel segment in the stretch marks treatment market is seeing a rapid shift towards online retail, making it the fastest-growing subsegment. The growing popularity of e-commerce platforms has made it easier for consumers to purchase stretch marks treatments from the comfort of their homes. Online retail provides a wide selection of products, from creams and ointments to advanced laser devices, offering consumers the convenience of home delivery and access to a broader range of options than traditional brick-and-mortar stores.
Online platforms also allow consumers to compare prices, read reviews, and access product information in a way that physical stores may not offer. Additionally, with the increase in internet penetration and the rise of e-commerce in emerging markets, online retail has seen significant growth, making it the fastest-growing distribution channel in the stretch marks treatment market. This trend is expected to continue as consumers increasingly turn to digital channels for their skincare needs.
Region Segment is Largest Owing to North America
The North American region holds the largest share of the stretch marks treatment market. This dominance can be attributed to a combination of factors, including high awareness of skincare products, a large consumer base seeking cosmetic treatments, and a well-established retail and online presence of stretch marks treatment brands. Additionally, the increasing adoption of aesthetic and dermatological treatments in the region has led to a growing demand for effective solutions for stretch marks.
North America’s position as the largest region is further supported by the significant investments made by leading companies in product development and marketing. The region’s mature healthcare infrastructure and a high number of dermatology clinics also contribute to the demand for stretch marks treatments. As consumer preferences continue to evolve towards non-invasive, home-use treatments, North America is expected to maintain its lead in the global market.
Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape
The stretch marks treatment market is highly competitive, with several prominent companies leading the way. Major players such as Johnson & Johnson, Beiersdorf AG, and Procter & Gamble have established strong presences in the market with their comprehensive product portfolios, which include creams, gels, and oils specifically designed for stretch mark treatment. These companies are focused on enhancing product formulations, incorporating ingredients that promote collagen production and skin elasticity to improve the appearance of stretch marks.
The competitive landscape also features several smaller, innovative brands such as Mederma, Bio-Oil, and Clarins that have gained recognition for their specialized offerings. As the market grows, companies are increasingly investing in research and development to introduce new treatments, improve product effectiveness, and cater to the diverse needs of consumers. The rise of e-commerce and direct-to-consumer models has further intensified competition, with companies expanding their online presence and exploring new marketing strategies to reach a broader audience. In this dynamic landscape, companies that prioritize innovation, consumer accessibility, and product effectiveness will likely maintain a competitive edge.
List of Leading Companies:
- Beiersdorf AG
- Johnson & Johnson
- Procter & Gamble Co.
- Mederma (Merz Pharmaceuticals)
- RevitaDerm
- Clarins Group
- Avon Products, Inc.
- L'Oréal Group
- Burt’s Bees
- Stretch Mark Cream by Bio-Oil
- SkinCeuticals (L'Oréal Group)
- DermaMed Solutions
- Thermacell
- Hada Labo (Rohto Pharmaceutical Co.)
- Tata Harper Skincare
Recent Developments:
- Beiersdorf AG announced the launch of a new line of anti-stretch mark creams formulated with natural ingredients, aimed at providing safer and more effective solutions for pregnant women.
- L'Oréal Group acquired a leading dermatology brand specializing in advanced laser treatments for stretch marks, expanding its portfolio in the skin care market.
- Johnson & Johnson unveiled a new partnership with dermatology clinics across North America to offer personalized stretch mark treatments using advanced laser technologies.
- Procter & Gamble launched a new range of stretch mark prevention creams and oils, which are now available for purchase via online retail platforms globally.
- Merz Pharmaceuticals gained FDA approval for a new microneedling treatment device designed to target deeper layers of skin, improving its effectiveness in treating severe stretch marks.
Report Scope:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2024-e) |
USD 2.6 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 6.0 Billion |
CAGR (2025 – 2030) |
15.2% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2024-e |
Historic Year |
2023 |
Forecast Period |
2025 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Stretch Marks Treatment Market By Product Type (Topical Creams and Ointments, Laser and Light Therapy, Microneedling, Chemical Peels), By Treatment Type (Prescription-Based Treatments, Over-the-Counter Treatments), By End-Use (Homecare, Dermatology Clinics, Hospitals, Spas and Salons), By Distribution Channel (Online Retail, Supermarkets/Pharmacies, Specialty Stores, Direct Sales) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Beiersdorf AG, Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble Co., Mederma (Merz Pharmaceuticals), RevitaDerm, Clarins Group, Avon Products, Inc., L'Oréal Group, Burt’s Bees, Stretch Mark Cream by Bio-Oil, SkinCeuticals (L'Oréal Group), DermaMed Solutions, Thermacell, Hada Labo (Rohto Pharmaceutical Co.), Tata Harper Skincare |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
4.1. Topical Creams and Ointments |
4.2. Laser and Light Therapy |
4.3. Microneedling |
4.4. Chemical Peels |
4.5. Others |
5. Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Treatment Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
5.1. Prescription-Based Treatments |
5.2. Over-the-Counter Treatments |
6. Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by End-Use (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
6.1. Homecare |
6.2. Dermatology Clinics |
6.3. Hospitals |
6.4. Spas and Salons |
7. Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
7.1. Online Retail |
7.2. Supermarkets/Pharmacies |
7.3. Specialty Stores |
7.4. Direct Sales |
8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030) |
8.1. Regional Overview |
8.2. North America |
8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3. Opportunities |
8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5. Technology Trends |
8.2.6. North America Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Product Type |
8.2.7. North America Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Treatment Type |
8.2.8. North America Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by End-Use |
8.2.9. North America Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel |
8.2.10. By Country |
8.2.10.1. US |
8.2.10.1.1. US Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Product Type |
8.2.10.1.2. US Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Treatment Type |
8.2.10.1.3. US Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by End-Use |
8.2.10.1.4. US Stretch Marks Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel |
8.2.10.2. Canada |
8.2.10.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
8.3. Europe |
8.4. Asia-Pacific |
8.5. Latin America |
8.6. Middle East & Africa |
9. Competitive Landscape |
9.1. Overview of the Key Players |
9.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
9.2.2. Market Consolidation |
9.2.3. Product Innovation |
9.3. Company Share Analysis |
9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1. Strategic Overview |
9.4.2. Product Innovations |
9.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8. Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1. Locations |
9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11. Buying Criteria |
10. Company Profiles |
10.1. Beiersdorf AG |
10.1.1. Company Overview |
10.1.2. Company Financials |
10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4. Recent Developments |
10.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2. Johnson & Johnson |
10.3. Procter & Gamble Co. |
10.4. Mederma (Merz Pharmaceuticals) |
10.5. RevitaDerm |
10.6. Clarins Group |
10.7. Avon Products, Inc. |
10.8. L'Oréal Group |
10.9. Burt’s Bees |
10.10. Stretch Mark Cream by Bio-Oil |
10.11. SkinCeuticals (L'Oréal Group) |
10.12. DermaMed Solutions |
10.13. Thermacell |
10.14. Hada Labo (Rohto Pharmaceutical Co.) |
10.15. Tata Harper Skincare |
11. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Stretch Marks Treatment Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Stretch Marks Treatment Market The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
- Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
- Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
- Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
- Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments
Market Size Assessment
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Stretch Marks Treatment Market These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
- Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
- Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
- Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.