Phlebotomy Tubes Market By Type (Glass Phlebotomy Tubes, Plastic Phlebotomy Tubes), By Additive Type (EDTA, Heparin, Sodium Citrate, Lithium Heparin, Gel Separator), By Application (Blood Collection, Blood Culture Testing, Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology), By End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Diagnostic Laboratories, Blood Banks, Clinics and Healthcare Centers, Research Institutes), By Capacity (Low Volume, Medium Volume, High Volume); Global Insights & Forecast (2024 - 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Phlebotomy Tubes Market was valued at USD 2.1 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 3.4 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 8.4% during 2025-2030.

The phlebotomy tubes market plays a critical role in the healthcare industry, specifically in diagnostic and laboratory testing. These tubes are designed to collect blood samples for various diagnostic procedures, making them a vital component in medical facilities worldwide. The increasing demand for blood tests due to growing health awareness, an aging population, and the rising prevalence of chronic diseases are key drivers fueling the market growth. Additionally, advances in diagnostic techniques and the increasing number of clinical laboratories further support the market's expansion. Phlebotomy tubes are used across several applications, including clinical chemistry, immunology, hematology, and blood culture testing, all of which require highly reliable and contamination-free blood collection methods.

As technology advances, the demand for specialized phlebotomy tubes with various additives is growing, allowing for more accurate and faster diagnostic results. The key trends influencing the market include increasing focus on blood collection efficiency, minimizing errors in diagnostics, and developing more advanced, user-friendly, and cost-effective products for various diagnostic purposes. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on improving the design and functionality of phlebotomy tubes, introducing innovations such as gel separators and tubes with different additive compositions to cater to diverse applications in the clinical setting.

Plastic Phlebotomy Tubes Are Dominant in the Market

Plastic phlebotomy tubes represent the largest subsegment in the market, primarily due to their cost-effectiveness, durability, and ease of handling compared to glass tubes. Plastic tubes offer a significant advantage in terms of reduced risk of breakage, making them a preferred choice for many healthcare providers. Additionally, plastic tubes are often lighter than their glass counterparts, making them more convenient for storage and transportation. As healthcare facilities worldwide move towards more cost-effective and efficient options, plastic phlebotomy tubes are increasingly favored for both high-volume and low-volume blood collection applications.

Another important factor contributing to the dominance of plastic phlebotomy tubes is their versatility in a wide range of applications. These tubes are commonly used for blood collection in clinical chemistry, hematology, and immunology due to their ability to retain and stabilize blood samples with additives. The growing demand for blood testing in hospitals and diagnostic laboratories, as well as the increasing use of automated systems for blood sample processing, is further fueling the preference for plastic over glass tubes. The development of new plastic-based formulations that provide better blood sample stability and improve diagnostic accuracy is also expected to drive further adoption in the coming years.

EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid) Additives Lead the Additive Type Market

EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) is the leading additive used in phlebotomy tubes, particularly for blood collection applications in hematology. EDTA is a powerful anticoagulant that prevents blood from clotting, making it an essential ingredient in tubes used for blood cell analysis. The global demand for EDTA-based tubes is growing, driven by the increasing number of blood tests in healthcare settings and their critical role in the diagnosis of blood-related disorders. EDTA additives ensure that blood samples can be processed accurately and quickly, making them ideal for diagnostic testing, particularly in the examination of blood cells.

In addition, EDTA has the advantage of being compatible with a broad range of diagnostic tests, which has helped it maintain its dominant position in the phlebotomy tube market. With the growing focus on early detection of diseases and disorders, particularly in oncology, hematology, and autoimmune diseases, the use of EDTA-based tubes is expected to rise. The ability to obtain accurate test results without compromising sample integrity makes EDTA a top choice for healthcare providers. As the medical industry continues to focus on improving diagnostic accuracy, the demand for EDTA-based phlebotomy tubes is expected to see robust growth.

Blood Collection Segment Drives Demand for Phlebotomy Tubes

The blood collection segment is the largest application area for phlebotomy tubes, accounting for a substantial share of the market. Blood collection is the first and most critical step in a wide range of diagnostic tests, which drives the consistent demand for phlebotomy tubes. Hospitals, clinics, and diagnostic laboratories rely heavily on phlebotomy tubes to ensure that samples are collected efficiently, safely, and without contamination. With the increasing demand for routine blood tests and specialized diagnostic tests across various medical specialties, the blood collection application is projected to maintain its dominant market position.

The rise in chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer, has led to a surge in blood testing procedures, further propelling the blood collection segment's growth. Additionally, the increasing trend of preventive healthcare and the focus on early disease detection contribute to the growing demand for blood collection services. As healthcare systems globally expand and modernize, blood collection remains a key component, driving the need for high-quality, reliable phlebotomy tubes.

Hospitals and Diagnostic Laboratories Are Leading End-Users

Hospitals and diagnostic laboratories are the leading end-users in the phlebotomy tubes market, representing a large portion of the total demand. Hospitals, with their extensive diagnostic and emergency care services, require a constant supply of phlebotomy tubes for a variety of purposes, including routine blood tests, urgent diagnostics, and critical care. Diagnostic laboratories, which specialize in testing and analysis, rely heavily on phlebotomy tubes to ensure that blood samples are collected, processed, and analyzed efficiently. The demand from these end-users is driven by the increasing number of diagnostic tests and growing patient numbers globally.

As hospitals and diagnostic laboratories expand, particularly in emerging markets, the need for reliable and cost-effective phlebotomy tubes is expected to continue to rise. The ongoing development of new diagnostic technologies and an increase in testing volumes for both chronic and infectious diseases further support the demand from these sectors. Additionally, the growing adoption of automation in medical laboratories enhances the efficiency of blood sample processing, driving demand for standardized and high-quality phlebotomy tubes.

North America to Maintain Dominance in the Phlebotomy Tubes Market

North America is expected to remain the largest region in the phlebotomy tubes market, primarily due to the high demand for diagnostic tests in the healthcare sector. The United States, with its advanced healthcare infrastructure and a well-established market for diagnostic services, contributes significantly to the region's dominance. The high prevalence of chronic diseases, coupled with the aging population in North America, is driving the demand for blood testing services. Additionally, North America's focus on early disease detection and preventive healthcare is pushing the adoption of high-quality diagnostic equipment, including phlebotomy tubes.

The region is also home to several major manufacturers of medical diagnostic products, providing a competitive edge to the market. The continuous advancements in healthcare technologies, along with increasing investments in research and development, are expected to bolster the growth of the phlebotomy tubes market in North America. As the demand for diagnostic testing rises, particularly in hospitals and diagnostic laboratories, North America will continue to lead the phlebotomy tubes market.

Competitive Landscape: Key Players and Market Strategies

The phlebotomy tubes market is competitive, with key players focusing on product innovation, quality, and cost-effectiveness to cater to the growing demand from hospitals, diagnostic laboratories, and clinics. Leading companies in the market include Becton Dickinson and Company, Terumo Corporation, Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, and Copan Italia S.p.A. These companies are continuously working on improving the design and functionality of their phlebotomy tubes, introducing products with specialized additives and advanced features such as gel separators.

The competitive landscape is also marked by strategic acquisitions, partnerships, and collaborations aimed at expanding product portfolios and entering new markets. Manufacturers are investing heavily in R&D to introduce more advanced phlebotomy tube options that offer better performance, accuracy, and convenience. The growing emphasis on automation in medical diagnostics is also driving the demand for phlebotomy tubes that can be easily integrated into automated systems, which is becoming a key focus for market players.

Recent Developments:

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific expanded its line of blood collection tubes with new, advanced plastic tubes designed for clinical diagnostics.
  • BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) launched a new range of phlebotomy tubes designed for faster, more efficient blood collection and sample processing.
  • Greiner Bio-One International GmbH announced the development of an innovative gel separator technology for enhanced blood sample separation.
  • Medtronic partnered with hospitals to provide new phlebotomy tube solutions that improve diagnostic accuracy and safety.
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. expanded its distribution network for phlebotomy tubes, focusing on emerging markets to enhance availability.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific
  • BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company)
  • Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
  • Sarstedt AG & Co.
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC
  • Medtronic
  • FL Medical
  • Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc.
  • Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
  • Shanghai Medical Corporation
  • Shanghai Yian Medical Devices Co., Ltd.
  • Neomedic Limited
  • MICSAP Medical
  • Hainan Zhongtai Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 2.1 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 3.4 Billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

8.4%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Phlebotomy Tubes Market By Type (Glass Phlebotomy Tubes, Plastic Phlebotomy Tubes), By Additive Type (EDTA, Heparin, Sodium Citrate, Lithium Heparin, Gel Separator), By Application (Blood Collection, Blood Culture Testing, Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology), By End-Use Industry (Hospitals, Diagnostic Laboratories, Blood Banks, Clinics and Healthcare Centers, Research Institutes), By Capacity (Low Volume, Medium Volume, High Volume)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Thermo Fisher Scientific, BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company), Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, Sarstedt AG & Co., Cardinal Health, Inc., Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC, Medtronic, FL Medical, Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc., Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Shanghai Medical Corporation, Shanghai Yian Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Neomedic Limited, MICSAP Medical, Hainan Zhongtai Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Glass Phlebotomy Tubes

   4.2. Plastic Phlebotomy Tubes

5. Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Additive Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid)

   5.2. Heparin

   5.3. Sodium Citrate

   5.4. Lithium Heparin

   5.5. Gel Separator

   5.6. Other Additives

6. Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Blood Collection

   6.2. Blood Culture Testing

   6.3. Clinical Chemistry

   6.4. Hematology

   6.5. Immunology

   6.6. Other Diagnostic Applications

7. Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by End-Use Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Hospitals

   7.2. Diagnostic Laboratories

   7.3. Blood Banks

   7.4. Clinics and Healthcare Centers

   7.5. Research Institutes

8. Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Capacity (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Low Volume (1-10 mL)

   8.2. Medium Volume (10-50 mL)

   8.3. High Volume (50-100 mL)

   8.4. Others

9. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   9.1. Regional Overview

   9.2. North America

      9.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      9.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      9.2.3. Opportunities

      9.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      9.2.5. Technology Trends

      9.2.6. North America Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Type

      9.2.7. North America Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Additive Type

      9.2.8. North America Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Application

      9.2.9. North America Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by End-Use Industry

      9.2.10. North America Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Capacity

      9.2.11. By Country

         9.2.11.1. US

               9.2.11.1.1. US Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Type

               9.2.11.1.2. US Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Additive Type

               9.2.11.1.3. US Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Application

               9.2.11.1.4. US Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by End-Use Industry

               9.2.11.1.5. US Phlebotomy Tubes Market, by Capacity

         9.2.11.2. Canada

         9.2.11.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   9.3. Europe

   9.4. Asia-Pacific

   9.5. Latin America

   9.6. Middle East & Africa

10. Competitive Landscape

   10.1. Overview of the Key Players

   10.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      10.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      10.2.2. Market Consolidation

      10.2.3. Product Innovation

   10.3. Company Share Analysis

   10.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      10.4.1. Strategic Overview

      10.4.2. Product Innovations

   10.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   10.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   10.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   10.8. Manufacturing Network

      10.8.1. Locations

      10.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      10.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      10.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      10.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   10.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   10.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   10.11. Buying Criteria

11. Company Profiles

   11.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific

      11.1.1. Company Overview

      11.1.2. Company Financials

      11.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      11.1.4. Recent Developments

      11.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   11.2. BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company)

   11.3. Greiner Bio-One International GmbH

   11.4. Sarstedt AG & Co.

   11.5. Cardinal Health, Inc.

   11.6. Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC

   11.7. Medtronic

   11.8. FL Medical

   11.9. Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc.

   11.10. Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

   11.11. Shanghai Medical Corporation

   11.12. Shanghai Yian Medical Devices Co., Ltd.

   11.13. Neomedic Limited

   11.14. MICSAP Medical

   11.15. Hainan Zhongtai Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.

12. Appendix

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Phlebotomy Tubes Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Phlebotomy Tubes Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Phlebotomy Tubes Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options