As per Intent Market Research, the Naval Radar Systems Market was valued at USD 5.3 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 7.1 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 4.1% during 2024 - 2030.
The naval radar systems market is witnessing significant growth due to advancements in radar technology, rising maritime security threats, and increasing defense budgets worldwide. These systems play a vital role in naval operations, ensuring efficient surveillance, navigation, and weapon guidance in challenging maritime environments. As global naval forces modernize and expand their fleets, the demand for innovative and efficient radar systems is on the rise, with certain segments demonstrating remarkable growth potential.
AESA Segment Is the Largest Owing to Its Advanced Capabilities
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar systems dominate the naval radar market due to their superior performance in multi-target tracking and high-resolution imaging. Their ability to perform multiple functions simultaneously, such as surveillance, guidance, and target detection, makes them a preferred choice for modern naval fleets. The adoption of AESA radars is driven by their robustness, reduced maintenance needs, and compatibility with modern combat systems.
With major defense contractors like Raytheon and Northrop Grumman investing in AESA advancements, these systems are increasingly integrated into both surface ships and submarines. Their deployment is particularly notable in advanced naval forces, such as those in North America and Europe, ensuring operational superiority in complex maritime missions.
Surface Ships Segment Leads Due to Wide-Scale Deployment
Surface ships, including aircraft carriers, destroyers, and frigates, represent the largest platform segment in the naval radar systems market. These vessels rely on cutting-edge radar technology for comprehensive situational awareness, enabling effective maritime defense and coordinated fleet operations.
The increasing emphasis on multi-role surface ships capable of engaging in diverse missions has further bolstered radar system adoption. The integration of high-performance radar systems like AESA and Doppler radars into modern warships enhances their capabilities in threat detection and missile guidance. Countries with expanding naval budgets, such as the United States and China, are spearheading initiatives to upgrade radar systems on their fleets, driving growth in this segment.
Weapon Guidance Segment Grows Rapidly with Technological Innovations
Weapon guidance is emerging as the fastest-growing application segment due to advancements in precision-guided weapon systems. Radar systems used in this segment are equipped with cutting-edge technologies that enhance accuracy, reduce reaction time, and improve missile interception capabilities.
The increasing adoption of radar systems for integrated weapon platforms, including anti-ship missiles and torpedoes, highlights their strategic importance. Defense forces are investing in radar technologies that enable seamless communication with weapon systems, ensuring operational success in high-stakes scenarios.
Naval Defense Forces Dominate as the Primary End-User
Naval defense forces account for the largest end-user segment in the naval radar systems market, driven by extensive fleet modernization programs and the need for advanced maritime defense solutions. With rising geopolitical tensions and growing concerns over territorial waters, naval forces globally are prioritizing investments in state-of-the-art radar systems.
These systems play a crucial role in bolstering national security, supporting operations ranging from surveillance and reconnaissance to missile defense and anti-submarine warfare. The United States, China, and European nations lead the charge in equipping their naval forces with sophisticated radar technology.
Asia-Pacific Emerges as the Fastest-Growing Region
The Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth in the naval radar systems market, fueled by increasing defense expenditures and naval fleet expansions in countries like China, India, and Japan. Regional tensions and territorial disputes in critical waterways such as the South China Sea are driving investments in advanced radar technologies.
Governments in the region are actively engaging in modernization programs, with significant funding directed toward integrating radar systems into next-generation vessels. The proliferation of domestic radar manufacturing capabilities, coupled with international collaborations, further supports the region’s growth trajectory.
Competitive Landscape and Leading Companies
The naval radar systems market is highly competitive, with key players including Thales Group, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Raytheon Technologies, Northrop Grumman, and BAE Systems. These companies focus on R&D and strategic partnerships to develop advanced radar technologies, catering to the evolving needs of global naval forces.
The competitive landscape is characterized by frequent product launches, mergers, and acquisitions, reflecting a dynamic market environment. For instance, Thales’ recent unveiling of the GO20 MM radar system and Saab’s strategic acquisitions in radar technology underscore the industry’s commitment to innovation and market leadership.
List of Leading Companies:
- Thales Group
- Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corporation)
- Northrop Grumman Corporation
- BAE Systems plc
- Saab AB
- Leonardo S.p.A.
- Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)
- HENSOLDT AG
- L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- Terma A/S
- Rosoboronexport
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- General Dynamics Corporation
Recent Developments:
- Thales Unveils GO20 MM Radar System designed for 360° 3D detection and UAV threat classification with advanced AI capabilities.
- L3Harris and RTX Partnership Announced targeting next-gen naval radar development with a focus on maritime defense applications.
- BAE Systems Wins Major U.K. Navy Contract awarded for upgrading radar systems to improve target detection and tracking accuracy.
- Saab Expands Radar Portfolio via Acquisition strengthens its market position by acquiring a firm specializing in advanced radar technologies.
- Leonardo Introduces Upgraded Naval Radar System enhanced with long-range detection and precision-guided targeting capabilities.
Report Scope:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023) |
USD 5.3 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 7.1 Billion |
CAGR (2024 – 2030) |
4.1% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023 |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Naval Radar Systems Market By Radar Type (Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA), Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA), Doppler Radar Systems, Continuous Wave Radar, Pulsed Radar Systems), By Platform (Surface Ships, Submarines, Coastal Surveillance Stations), By Application (Surveillance, Weapon Guidance, Navigation, Airborne Threat Detection), By End-User (Naval Defense Forces, Commercial Shipping Companies) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Thales Group, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corporation), Northrop Grumman Corporation, BAE Systems plc, Saab AB, Leonardo S.p.A., Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd., Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), HENSOLDT AG, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Terma A/S, Rosoboronexport, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Naval Radar Systems Market, by Radar Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
4.1. Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) |
4.2. Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) |
4.3. Doppler Radar Systems |
4.4. Continuous Wave Radar |
4.5. Pulsed Radar Systems |
4.6. Others |
5. Naval Radar Systems Market, by Platform (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
5.1. Surface Ships |
5.2. Submarines |
5.3. Coastal Surveillance Stations |
6. Naval Radar Systems Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
6.1. Surveillance |
6.2. Weapon Guidance |
6.3. Navigation |
6.4. Airborne Threat Detection |
6.5. Others |
7. Naval Radar Systems Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
7.1. Naval Defense Forces |
7.2. Commercial Shipping Companies |
7.3. Others |
8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
8.1. Regional Overview |
8.2. North America |
8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3. Opportunities |
8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5. Technology Trends |
8.2.6. North America Naval Radar Systems Market, by Radar Type |
8.2.7. North America Naval Radar Systems Market, by Platform |
8.2.8. North America Naval Radar Systems Market, by Application |
8.2.9. North America Naval Radar Systems Market, by End-User |
8.2.10. By Country |
8.2.10.1. US |
8.2.10.1.1. US Naval Radar Systems Market, by Radar Type |
8.2.10.1.2. US Naval Radar Systems Market, by Platform |
8.2.10.1.3. US Naval Radar Systems Market, by Application |
8.2.10.1.4. US Naval Radar Systems Market, by End-User |
8.2.10.2. Canada |
8.2.10.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
8.3. Europe |
8.4. Asia-Pacific |
8.5. Latin America |
8.6. Middle East & Africa |
9. Competitive Landscape |
9.1. Overview of the Key Players |
9.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
9.2.2. Market Consolidation |
9.2.3. Product Innovation |
9.3. Company Share Analysis |
9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1. Strategic Overview |
9.4.2. Product Innovations |
9.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8. Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1. Locations |
9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11. Buying Criteria |
10. Company Profiles |
10.1. Thales Group |
10.1.1. Company Overview |
10.1.2. Company Financials |
10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4. Recent Developments |
10.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2. Lockheed Martin Corporation |
10.3. Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corporation) |
10.4. Northrop Grumman Corporation |
10.5. BAE Systems plc |
10.6. Saab AB |
10.7. Leonardo S.p.A. |
10.8. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. |
10.9. Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) |
10.10. HENSOLDT AG |
10.11. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
10.12. Terma A/S |
10.13. Rosoboronexport |
10.14. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation |
10.15. General Dynamics Corporation |
11. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Naval Radar Systems Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Naval Radar Systems Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
- Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
- Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
- Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
- Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments
Market Size Assessment
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Naval Radar Systems Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
- Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
- Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
- Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.
NA