Oncolytic Virotherapy Market By Product Type (Oncolytic Viruses, Oncolytic Virus-based Therapies), By Application (Cancer Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy for Solid Tumors, Combination with Other Treatments), By Technology (Viral Vector Technology, Gene Editing Technology), By End-User (Hospitals, Research Institutions, Cancer Treatment Centers), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Oncolytic Virotherapy Market was valued at USD 0.8 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 2.5 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 20.8% during 2025 - 2030.

The oncolytic virotherapy market is poised for significant growth due to the promising potential of oncolytic viruses in treating various types of cancers. Oncolytic virotherapy involves using genetically modified or naturally occurring viruses that specifically target and kill cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue. The treatment works by infecting cancer cells, causing them to rupture and die, and in some cases, stimulating an immune response that further aids in the destruction of the tumor. As traditional cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation, often come with harsh side effects, oncolytic virotherapy offers an alternative that can be more targeted and less damaging to healthy cells. The ongoing research and development in this field are rapidly enhancing the effectiveness and specificity of these therapies.

The market for oncolytic virotherapy is expanding as more cancers are being treated with these innovative therapies, and clinical trials continue to show favorable results, particularly in solid tumors. Increased investment in oncolytic viral therapy research, along with advancements in genetic engineering and viral vector technologies, is driving the market’s growth. The ability of oncolytic viruses to not only directly kill cancer cells but also to stimulate the body’s immune system to recognize and fight cancer presents a dual mechanism of action that is highly attractive to both clinicians and patients. As the technology matures, more viral therapies are expected to enter the market, creating new opportunities for treating cancer more effectively and with fewer side effects.

Oncolytic Viruses Are Largest Product Type Owing to Their Direct Tumor-Targeting Mechanism

Oncolytic viruses are the largest product type in the oncolytic virotherapy market due to their ability to directly infect and destroy cancer cells. These viruses, including engineered and naturally occurring varieties, selectively infect tumor cells while leaving normal cells unharmed. This highly specific targeting mechanism gives oncolytic viruses an advantage over traditional cancer treatments, which often damage healthy tissue along with cancerous cells. The continued advancement of viral engineering techniques, such as genetic modifications that enhance the virus’s tumor selectivity and therapeutic efficacy, is further propelling the adoption of oncolytic viruses in clinical settings.

The growing success of oncolytic virus-based therapies in clinical trials is reinforcing the demand for these products, particularly for hard-to-treat cancers such as glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma. Oncolytic viruses have the potential to be used in combination with other therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, to enhance their therapeutic effect. As research in this field progresses and more viruses are developed to target specific types of cancer, oncolytic viruses are expected to remain the dominant product type in the oncolytic virotherapy market.

Cancer Immunotherapy Is Largest Application Segment Owing to Growing Focus on Targeted Cancer Treatments

Cancer immunotherapy is the largest application segment in the oncolytic virotherapy market, primarily due to the growing focus on developing targeted therapies that enhance the body’s immune response to fight cancer. Oncolytic virotherapy, particularly when combined with immunotherapy, has demonstrated the ability to activate the immune system and improve the overall therapeutic response. This combination approach enhances the patient’s ability to fight cancer on multiple fronts, not only through direct tumor destruction but also by stimulating a systemic immune response against cancer cells.

The rising interest in immunotherapy is driven by its promising results in clinical trials, particularly for cancers that have been difficult to treat with conventional methods. Oncolytic virotherapy’s ability to stimulate immune responses is increasingly being recognized as a valuable addition to cancer immunotherapy, leading to a surge in its adoption for cancer treatment. As a result, the combination of oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy is expected to continue driving the growth of the cancer immunotherapy segment in the oncolytic virotherapy market.

Viral Vector Technology Is Largest Technology Segment Due to Its Role in Enhancing Viral Delivery Systems

Viral vector technology is the largest technology segment in the oncolytic virotherapy market, owing to its pivotal role in improving the delivery of therapeutic agents to cancer cells. Viral vectors are used to transport genetic material or therapeutic proteins into cells, and in the case of oncolytic virotherapy, they are designed to deliver genes that can selectively destroy tumor cells or enhance immune system activity. The use of viral vectors allows for more efficient and targeted delivery of therapeutic agents, which is crucial for the success of oncolytic virotherapy.

The development of advanced viral vector technologies has significantly improved the effectiveness of oncolytic virotherapy. These technologies enable researchers to design viruses with enhanced tumor specificity and the ability to bypass the body’s immune defenses, increasing the therapeutic potential of these treatments. As viral vector technology continues to evolve, it is expected to remain the dominant technology in the oncolytic virotherapy market, driving advancements in both research and clinical applications.

Hospitals Are Largest End-User Segment Due to Their Role in Cancer Treatment Delivery

Hospitals are the largest end-user segment in the oncolytic virotherapy market due to their central role in delivering cancer treatments, including emerging therapies such as oncolytic virotherapy. Hospitals are equipped with the necessary infrastructure, medical expertise, and regulatory approval to administer complex cancer therapies, including those involving genetically modified viruses. The growing number of clinical trials and successful case studies in hospital settings is further solidifying their position as the primary end-users of oncolytic virotherapy.

As the adoption of oncolytic virotherapy increases, hospitals are expected to remain the leading end-users due to their capacity to manage and administer cutting-edge cancer treatments. The integration of oncolytic virotherapy into hospital cancer care programs, particularly in specialized oncology departments, will continue to drive the demand for these therapies. Additionally, the development of combination therapies and personalized treatment plans will further strengthen the role of hospitals in the oncolytic virotherapy market.

North America Is Largest Region Owing to Strong Healthcare Infrastructure and High Adoption of Oncolytic Virotherapy

North America is the largest region in the oncolytic virotherapy market, driven by its robust healthcare infrastructure, high adoption of advanced therapies, and a growing number of clinical trials. The United States, in particular, has a well-established healthcare system that supports the use of innovative treatments such as oncolytic virotherapy. Moreover, North America is home to many leading biotechnology companies and research institutions that are at the forefront of developing oncolytic virus-based therapies. The region's strong regulatory framework, along with its significant investment in cancer research and development, contributes to its dominance in the global market.

As more oncolytic virotherapy treatments receive approval and enter clinical practice, North America is expected to maintain its leadership position in the market. The continued development of novel therapies, combined with the region's focus on precision medicine, ensures that North America will remain a key player in the oncolytic virotherapy market.

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The oncolytic virotherapy market is highly competitive, with several major players leading the charge in developing and commercializing oncolytic virus-based therapies. Key companies in this space include Amgen, Oncolytics Biotech, and ViroMed, which are at the forefront of developing innovative oncolytic virotherapy products. These companies are focused on advancing their pipeline of oncolytic virus therapies through clinical trials and collaborations with research institutions and hospitals.

The competitive landscape is marked by strategic partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and significant investment in research and development to accelerate the commercialization of oncolytic virotherapy products. As the market for cancer treatments continues to evolve, companies that can successfully bring safe and effective oncolytic therapies to market will be positioned for success. The growing focus on precision medicine and personalized cancer treatments further intensifies competition, as companies strive to develop the next generation of cancer therapies that can offer improved outcomes and fewer side effects.

Recent Developments:

  • In December 2024, Oncolytics Biotech Inc. announced a partnership with a leading pharmaceutical company to advance the development of its oncolytic virotherapy for solid tumors.
  • In November 2024, Amgen Inc. launched a clinical trial combining oncolytic virotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors for enhanced cancer treatment.
  • In October 2024, Targovax ASA received approval to begin Phase III trials for its oncolytic virotherapy targeting melanoma and other cancers.
  • In September 2024, SillaJen Inc. reported successful results from a Phase II trial of its oncolytic virus therapy in treating liver cancer.
  • In August 2024, Replimune Group Inc. presented promising results in early clinical trials of its oncolytic virus treatment for lung cancer.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Amgen Inc.
  • Oncolytics Biotech Inc.
  • Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. Ltd.
  • BioVex, Inc. (acquired by Amgen)
  • Jennerex Biotherapeutics (acquired by SillaJen)
  • SillaJen Inc.
  • Viralytics Ltd. (acquired by Merck)
  • Targovax ASA
  • Advantagene, Inc.
  • ViroMed Co. Ltd.
  • Replimune Group Inc.
  • Biothera Pharmaceuticals
  • ImmunoGen, Inc.
  • ECHO Biotech
  • ONCOS-102 (Oncos Therapeutics)

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 0.8 billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 2.5 billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

20.8%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Oncolytic Virotherapy Market By Product Type (Oncolytic Viruses, Oncolytic Virus-based Therapies), By Application (Cancer Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy for Solid Tumors, Combination with Other Treatments), By Technology (Viral Vector Technology, Gene Editing Technology), By End-User (Hospitals, Research Institutions, Cancer Treatment Centers)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Amgen Inc., Oncolytics Biotech Inc., Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. Ltd., BioVex, Inc. (acquired by Amgen), Jennerex Biotherapeutics (acquired by SillaJen), SillaJen Inc., Viralytics Ltd. (acquired by Merck), Targovax ASA, Advantagene, Inc., ViroMed Co. Ltd., Replimune Group Inc., Biothera Pharmaceuticals, ImmunoGen, Inc., ECHO Biotech, ONCOS-102 (Oncos Therapeutics)

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Oncolytic Viruses

      4.1.1. DNA Oncolytic Viruses

      4.1.2. RNA Oncolytic Viruses

   4.2. Oncolytic Virus-based Therapies

5. Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Cancer Immunotherapy

   5.2. Targeted Therapy for Solid Tumors

   5.3. Combination with Other Treatments

6. Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Viral Vector Technology

   6.2. Gene Editing Technology

7. Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Hospitals

   7.2. Research Institutions

   7.3. Cancer Treatment Centers

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Product Type

      8.2.7. North America Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Application

      8.2.8. North America Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Technology

      8.2.9. North America Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by End-User

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Product Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Application

               8.2.10.1.3. US Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by Technology

               8.2.10.1.4. US Oncolytic Virotherapy Market, by End-User

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. Amgen Inc.

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Oncolytics Biotech Inc.

   10.3. Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. Ltd.

   10.4. BioVex, Inc. (acquired by Amgen)

   10.5. Jennerex Biotherapeutics (acquired by SillaJen)

   10.6. SillaJen Inc.

   10.7. Viralytics Ltd. (acquired by Merck)

   10.8. Targovax ASA

   10.9. Advantagene, Inc.

   10.10. ViroMed Co. Ltd.

   10.11. Replimune Group Inc.

   10.12. Biothera Pharmaceuticals

   10.13. ImmunoGen, Inc.

   10.14. ECHO Biotech

   10.15. ONCOS-102 (Oncos Therapeutics)

11. Appendix

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Oncolytic Virotherapy Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Oncolytic Virotherapy Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Oncolytic Virotherapy Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options