Interdental Brush Market By Product Type (Manual Interdental Brushes, Electric Interdental Brushes), By Bristle Type (Soft Bristles, Medium Bristles, Hard Bristles), By End-User (Adults, Children, Elderly), By Distribution Channel (Online Retail, Offline Retail, Direct Sales), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Interdental Brush Market was valued at USD 0.3 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 0.4 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 6.8% during 2025-2030.

The global interdental brush market is experiencing steady growth as consumers increasingly prioritize oral hygiene and preventative dental care. These brushes are designed to clean between the teeth, an area where traditional toothbrushes may miss. With rising awareness about the importance of maintaining gum health and preventing conditions such as gum disease, the demand for interdental brushes is expected to grow across various regions. In this market, we see distinct trends shaping the adoption of specific product types, bristle types, end-users, and distribution channels.

Manual Interdental Brushes Are Largest Owing to Affordability and Accessibility

Among the various product types, manual interdental brushes hold the largest market share due to their affordability and ease of use. These brushes are widely available in retail stores and online platforms, making them accessible to a broad consumer base. Despite the growing popularity of electric brushes, manual brushes remain the most commonly used option, especially among cost-conscious consumers or those who prefer a simpler, more traditional approach to oral hygiene. The simplicity of manual brushes also appeals to users who want direct control over their brushing technique without the need for batteries or charging.

The affordability of manual interdental brushes has made them a popular choice in both developed and emerging markets. As oral care awareness increases globally, manual brushes continue to dominate sales due to their low price point and broad availability through pharmacies, supermarkets, and online retail channels. Additionally, manual brushes are often recommended by dental professionals for their effectiveness in cleaning interdental spaces, further enhancing their market reach.

Interdental Brush Market Size

Soft Bristles Segment Is Fastest Growing Owing to Gentle Care Preferences

When considering bristle types, soft bristles are the fastest-growing segment in the interdental brush market. Soft bristles provide a gentle cleaning experience, which is preferred by users with sensitive gums or those who are prone to gum irritation. This preference for softer bristles aligns with the broader trend in the oral care industry towards products that offer a comfortable and non-invasive experience while maintaining high cleaning efficacy. As awareness of gum health increases, consumers are opting for soft bristles to prevent damage to delicate gum tissues while still achieving effective plaque removal.

The growing demand for soft-bristled interdental brushes is further fueled by the increasing number of individuals seeking to prevent gum disease and other oral health issues. Additionally, dental professionals often recommend soft bristles for their ability to clean effectively without causing harm to the gums, making them an attractive choice for a wide range of users. This trend towards gentler brushing solutions is expected to continue as consumers become more informed about the benefits of using soft-bristled brushes for long-term oral health maintenance.

Adults Segment Is Largest Due to High Oral Care Awareness

The adults segment is the largest in terms of end-users for interdental brushes. Adults are the primary consumers of interdental brushes as they are more likely to be aware of the importance of maintaining good oral hygiene and preventing gum disease. As people age, they become more conscious of their dental health, leading to higher adoption of interdental brushes as part of their daily oral care routine. Adults are also more likely to have dental issues such as receding gums, cavities, or orthodontic appliances, making interdental cleaning an essential part of their oral hygiene practices.

The growing focus on preventive healthcare and the increasing prevalence of dental conditions such as periodontitis and gingivitis among adults are contributing factors to the larger market share in this segment. As oral health education campaigns continue to reach global populations, adults will continue to drive the demand for interdental brushes, ensuring their dominance in the overall market landscape.

Online Retail Is Fastest Growing Distribution Channel

The online retail segment is the fastest-growing distribution channel for interdental brushes, driven by the increasing trend of e-commerce and changing consumer shopping habits. The convenience of purchasing dental care products online, combined with the ability to access a wide range of products from different brands, has made online retail a popular choice. Consumers can easily compare prices, read reviews, and have products delivered to their doorstep, offering a streamlined and user-friendly experience that traditional offline retail channels cannot match.

The growth of online shopping, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, has accelerated the shift to online retail for oral care products. As more consumers recognize the benefits of purchasing healthcare products from the comfort of their homes, online retail is expected to continue growing at a rapid pace. The ability to access global brands and niche products online further reinforces its position as the fastest-growing channel for interdental brushes.

Europe Is Largest Region Due to High Oral Hygiene Awareness

Europe is the largest region in the interdental brush market, driven by high consumer awareness of oral hygiene and the presence of well-established dental care infrastructure. European consumers are highly conscious of maintaining oral health, and interdental cleaning is a widely accepted practice. Countries like Germany, France, and the UK have seen a growing trend toward preventive dental care, with many dental professionals recommending interdental brushes as an essential part of daily oral hygiene routines.

In addition to consumer awareness, Europe’s well-developed healthcare systems, which emphasize preventive care, further support the widespread adoption of interdental brushes. As a result, the region remains the largest market for these products, with a strong presence of both manual and electric interdental brush options. The growing focus on sustainable and eco-friendly products also aligns with the rising demand for environmentally conscious oral care solutions in Europe.

Interdental Brush Market Size by Region 2030

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The interdental brush market is characterized by the presence of several key players, including global leaders such as Procter & Gamble (Oral-B), Colgate-Palmolive, TePe, and Philips Sonicare. These companies dominate the market by offering a wide range of interdental brushes that cater to different consumer needs, from manual brushes to advanced electric models. They are also investing in innovative technologies and eco-friendly solutions to capture a larger share of the growing demand for sustainable oral care products.

Competition in this market is intense, with companies focusing on product differentiation, quality improvements, and strategic partnerships with dental professionals to enhance brand credibility. Additionally, manufacturers are increasingly incorporating digital tools, such as app connectivity for electric brushes, to attract tech-savvy consumers. As the market continues to grow, companies will need to innovate and adapt to changing consumer preferences to maintain a competitive edge.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Procter & Gamble (Oral-B)
  • Colgate-Palmolive
  • TePe
  • GUM (Sunstar)
  • CURAPROX
  • Philips Sonicare
  • Sensodyne (GlaxoSmithKline)
  • Dr. Best
  • DenTek
  • Marvis
  • Interdental Brushes
  • Hager & Werken
  • SmileDirectClub
  • Waterpik
  • Lion Corporation

Recent Developments:

  • TePe introduced a new series of environmentally sustainable interdental brushes, incorporating biodegradable materials to align with eco-conscious consumer preferences.
  • Philips Sonicare announced the launch of a new electric interdental brush that integrates advanced sonic technology to provide enhanced cleaning performance.
  • Colgate-Palmolive acquired the GUM brand by Sunstar to bolster its presence in the interdental care market and expand its oral health product portfolio.
  • Waterpik launched an innovative interdental brush that combines the benefits of water flossing with traditional interdental brushing for improved gum health.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 0.3 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 0.4 Billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

6.8%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Interdental Brush Market By Product Type (Manual Interdental Brushes, Electric Interdental Brushes), By Bristle Type (Soft Bristles, Medium Bristles, Hard Bristles), By End-User (Adults, Children, Elderly), By Distribution Channel (Online Retail, Offline Retail, Direct Sales)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Procter & Gamble (Oral-B), Colgate-Palmolive, TePe, GUM (Sunstar), CURAPROX, Philips Sonicare, Sensodyne (GlaxoSmithKline), Dr. Best, DenTek, Marvis, Interdental Brushes, Hager & Werken, SmileDirectClub, Waterpik, Lion Corporation

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Interdental Brush Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Manual Interdental Brushes

   4.2. Electric Interdental Brushes

5. Interdental Brush Market, by Bristle Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Soft Bristles

   5.2. Medium Bristles

   5.3. Hard Bristles

6. Interdental Brush Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Adults

   6.2. Children

   6.3. Elderly

7. Interdental Brush Market, by Distribution Channel (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Online Retail

   7.2. Offline Retail

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Interdental Brush Market, by Product Type

      8.2.7. North America Interdental Brush Market, by Bristle Type

      8.2.8. North America Interdental Brush Market, by End-User

      8.2.9. North America Interdental Brush Market, by Distribution Channel

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Interdental Brush Market, by Product Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Interdental Brush Market, by Bristle Type

               8.2.10.1.3. US Interdental Brush Market, by End-User

               8.2.10.1.4. US Interdental Brush Market, by Distribution Channel

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. Procter & Gamble (Oral-B)

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Colgate-Palmolive

   10.3. TePe

   10.4. GUM (Sunstar)

   10.5. CURAPROX

   10.6. Philips Sonicare

   10.7. Sensodyne (GlaxoSmithKline)

   10.8. Dr. Best

   10.9. DenTek

   10.10. Marvis

   10.11. Interdental Brushes

   10.12. Hager & Werken

   10.13. SmileDirectClub

   10.14. Waterpik

   10.15. Lion Corporation

11. Appendix

 

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Interdental Brush Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Interdental Brush Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach - Interdental Brush Market

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Interdental Brush Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down - Interdental Brush Market

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.


I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options