sales@intentmarketresearch.com
+1 463-583-2713
As per Intent Market Research, the Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 4.3 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 8.1% during 2024 - 2030.
The gene therapy for rare diseases market has experienced remarkable growth, driven by advancements in biotechnology and an increasing focus on rare and genetic disorders. Gene therapy, which involves the introduction, removal, or alteration of genetic material within a patient's cells, offers a promising treatment option for diseases that currently have no cure. For rare diseases, especially those caused by genetic mutations, gene therapy provides a potential pathway to address the underlying causes of these conditions. The global market for gene therapy for rare diseases is expanding, fueled by innovations in technology, regulatory support, and an improving understanding of genetic diseases.
Gene therapy for rare diseases aims to provide long-term, potentially curative treatments for conditions that affect a small proportion of the population. This market benefits from increasing awareness of the unmet medical need for rare disease treatments, alongside supportive initiatives from governments and healthcare organizations. With significant breakthroughs in genetic engineering tools, such as CRISPR and RNA-based therapies, gene therapy is quickly becoming a crucial component of the treatment landscape for rare diseases, particularly in genetic disorders, metabolic diseases, and certain hematologic conditions. The success of several high-profile gene therapy clinical trials and FDA-approved therapies has also helped foster investor confidence, pushing the market forward.
Among the various therapeutic areas, genetic disorders remain the largest segment within the gene therapy for rare diseases market. This segment includes conditions such as cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and hemophilia, all of which are caused by mutations in a person's DNA. Genetic disorders often lead to lifelong challenges, including chronic illness and shortened life expectancy, making them a focal point for gene therapy innovation. With the growing understanding of the genetic basis of these diseases, gene therapy has emerged as a promising approach to address these underlying genetic mutations and provide potential cures.
The large-scale efforts to develop gene therapies for genetic disorders are supported by the high unmet medical need and increasing patient demand for effective treatments. Advances in viral vector-based gene delivery and other gene-editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, have been instrumental in making gene therapy a viable option for these diseases. As clinical trials for genetic disorders progress and more therapies gain regulatory approval, the genetic disorders segment is expected to maintain its dominance, contributing significantly to the overall growth of the gene therapy for rare diseases market.
Viral vectors are currently the dominant technology in the gene therapy for rare diseases market. Viral vectors are used to deliver therapeutic genes into a patient's cells, utilizing the natural ability of viruses to infect cells and introduce genetic material. This technology has proven to be highly effective for a range of genetic and rare diseases, allowing for the delivery of genes that can correct genetic mutations or compensate for defective genes. Due to their efficiency in gene delivery and ability to target specific cell types, viral vectors, particularly adenovirus and lentivirus-based vectors, are extensively used in gene therapy development.
The popularity of viral vectors stems from their well-established clinical history and success in early gene therapy trials. These vectors can be engineered to be less immunogenic and more effective at gene delivery, making them suitable for long-term therapeutic applications. Despite challenges such as immune responses and vector production scalability, viral vectors continue to play a central role in the development of gene therapies for rare diseases, especially in high-impact conditions like hemophilia and muscular dystrophies. As gene therapy research evolves, improvements in viral vector technology are expected to enhance the safety and efficacy of treatments, maintaining their leadership in this space.
The intravenous (IV) administration route is the most widely used method for delivering gene therapies, particularly for rare diseases. Intravenous administration allows for the direct delivery of gene therapies into the bloodstream, enabling the treatment to reach systemic circulation quickly and effectively. This is particularly beneficial for genetic disorders that affect multiple organs or systems in the body, as the therapy can be delivered throughout the body via the bloodstream. IV administration has proven to be the preferred method for several gene therapies already approved for rare diseases, such as those treating hemophilia and spinal muscular atrophy.
The IV route offers several advantages, including ease of administration in clinical settings, especially in hospitals and outpatient clinics. Additionally, intravenous gene delivery allows for a more controlled and predictable distribution of the therapy, which is essential for maximizing its effectiveness. Given the widespread adoption of IV gene therapy delivery in clinical trials and the promising results of existing therapies, intravenous administration is expected to remain the leading route of administration in the gene therapy for rare diseases market.
Hospitals are the largest end-user segment in the gene therapy for rare diseases market. Hospitals, especially specialized centers with advanced genetic and gene therapy capabilities, play a critical role in the administration of gene therapy treatments. These institutions have the infrastructure and expertise required to handle the complex nature of gene therapies, which often require specialized equipment, trained personnel, and rigorous monitoring. As gene therapies move from clinical trials to widespread use, hospitals are expected to continue as the primary setting for patient treatment, particularly as more gene therapies are approved by regulatory agencies.
The hospital segment is driven by the increasing availability of gene therapy treatments and the growing number of patients diagnosed with rare genetic diseases who require specialized care. Furthermore, hospitals are central to the integration of new therapies into clinical practice, making them a key focal point for the market. The increasing number of rare disease treatments entering the market, along with rising healthcare expenditures, ensures that hospitals will remain the largest end-user segment in the gene therapy for rare diseases market.
North America is the largest region in the gene therapy for rare diseases market, largely due to its well-established healthcare infrastructure, advanced research capabilities, and supportive regulatory environment. The United States, in particular, has been at the forefront of gene therapy development, with a robust pipeline of gene therapies for rare diseases and significant investment in biotechnology research. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been actively supporting the approval of gene therapies, providing fast-track programs and breakthrough therapy designations for promising gene treatments. As a result, North America has become a global leader in gene therapy research, clinical trials, and commercialization.
The dominance of North America is also supported by the presence of leading biotechnology companies, research institutions, and hospitals, which drive innovation and clinical implementation of gene therapies. The region’s strong focus on rare disease treatments and personalized medicine, combined with high healthcare spending, ensures its continued leadership in the gene therapy market. As the gene therapy landscape continues to evolve, North America will remain a key region for market growth and technological advancements.
The gene therapy for rare diseases market is highly competitive, with several key players focused on advancing gene therapy technologies and developing novel treatments. Leading companies in this space include Novartis, Spark Therapeutics, Bluebird Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Gilead Sciences. These companies are at the forefront of gene therapy innovation, with extensive pipelines targeting rare genetic disorders such as hemophilia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and spinal muscular atrophy. The competitive landscape is also characterized by numerous biotech startups and collaborations, which are working to accelerate the development of gene therapies and expand the market.
Companies are focusing on improving the safety and efficacy of gene therapies, addressing challenges such as immunogenicity, delivery mechanisms, and manufacturing scalability. Strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and investments in research and development are key strategies for market players to strengthen their positions. As the gene therapy for rare diseases market grows, competition will intensify, with companies striving to bring innovative and affordable therapies to patients suffering from rare genetic conditions.
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023) |
USD 2.5 billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 4.3 billion |
CAGR (2024 – 2030) |
8.1% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023 |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market By Therapeutic Area (Genetic Disorders, Metabolic Disorders, Hematologic Diseases, Muscular Dystrophies, Neurological Disorders), By Technology (Viral Vectors, Non-Viral Vectors, CRISPR/Cas9, RNA-Based Therapies), By Administration Route (Intravenous, Intramuscular, Subcutaneous, Intra-arterial, Local Administration), By End-User (Hospitals, Research Institutions, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Spark Therapeutics, Bluebird Bio, Inc., Novartis AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., CRISPR Therapeutics AG, Editas Medicine, Inc., Orchard Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc., GeneTx Biotherapeutics, AveXis, Inc. (Novartis), MedGene Biotech, Bayer AG, RegenXBio, Inc. |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Therapeutic Area (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
4.1. Genetic Disorders |
4.2. Metabolic Disorders |
4.3. Hematologic Diseases |
4.4. Muscular Dystrophies |
4.5. Neurological Disorders |
4.6. Others |
5. Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
5.1. Viral Vectors |
5.2. Non-Viral Vectors |
5.3. CRISPR/Cas9 |
5.4. RNA-Based Therapies |
5.5. Others |
6. Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Administration Route (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
6.1. Intravenous |
6.2. Intramuscular |
6.3. Subcutaneous |
6.4. Intra-arterial |
6.5. Local Administration |
7. Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
7.1. Hospitals |
7.2. Research Institutions |
7.3. Biotechnology Companies |
7.4. Contract Research Organizations |
7.5. Others |
8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
8.1. Regional Overview |
8.2. North America |
8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3. Opportunities |
8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5. Technology Trends |
8.2.6. North America Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Therapeutic Area |
8.2.7. North America Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Technology |
8.2.8. North America Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Administration Route |
8.2.9. North America Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by End-User |
8.2.10. By Country |
8.2.10.1. US |
8.2.10.1.1. US Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Therapeutic Area |
8.2.10.1.2. US Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Technology |
8.2.10.1.3. US Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by Administration Route |
8.2.10.1.4. US Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market, by End-User |
8.2.10.2. Canada |
8.2.10.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
8.3. Europe |
8.4. Asia-Pacific |
8.5. Latin America |
8.6. Middle East & Africa |
9. Competitive Landscape |
9.1. Overview of the Key Players |
9.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
9.2.2. Market Consolidation |
9.2.3. Product Innovation |
9.3. Company Share Analysis |
9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1. Strategic Overview |
9.4.2. Product Innovations |
9.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8. Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1. Locations |
9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11. Buying Criteria |
10. Company Profiles |
10.1. Spark Therapeutics |
10.1.1. Company Overview |
10.1.2. Company Financials |
10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4. Recent Developments |
10.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2. Bluebird Bio, Inc. |
10.3. Novartis AG |
10.4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
10.5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
10.6. Pfizer, Inc. |
10.7. CRISPR Therapeutics AG |
10.8. Editas Medicine, Inc. |
10.9. Orchard Therapeutics |
10.10. Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc. |
10.11. GeneTx Biotherapeutics |
10.12. AveXis, Inc. (Novartis) |
10.13. MedGene Biotech |
10.14. Bayer AG |
10.15. RegenXBio, Inc. |
11. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Gene Therapy For Rare Disease Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.