Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market By Type (Forestry Carbon Credits, Land Use Carbon Credits, Combined Carbon Credits), By End-Use Industry (Corporations & Enterprises, Governments & Nonprofits, Environmental Organizations), By Application (Carbon Offset Programs, Carbon Footprint Reduction, Corporate Sustainability Initiatives), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2024 – 2030).

As per Intent Market Research, the Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market was valued at USD 4.3 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 9.1 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 13.5% during 2025 - 2030.

The Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market is an essential segment in the broader carbon credit industry, driven by the growing global focus on combating climate change through carbon offset initiatives. This market allows organizations to purchase carbon credits derived from forestry and land-use projects, which focus on reducing emissions by promoting sustainable land management practices, afforestation, reforestation, and conservation efforts. As the world increasingly prioritizes environmental sustainability and corporate responsibility, forestry and land-use carbon credits play a critical role in helping businesses meet their emissions reduction targets.

The demand for forestry and land-use carbon credits is fueled by regulations, voluntary corporate commitments to sustainability, and public and private sector collaboration to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon credits from these sectors not only help offset carbon footprints but also support biodiversity conservation, community development, and sustainable agricultural practices. As a result, the market for forestry and land-use carbon credits continues to expand, with a growing number of industries and organizations recognizing their value in achieving climate goals.

Forestry Carbon Credits Are Largest Due to Strong Demand for Carbon Offset Initiatives

Forestry Carbon Credits are the largest segment in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market. These credits are generated from activities related to forest preservation, afforestation, reforestation, and sustainable forest management, which sequester carbon from the atmosphere. Forestry carbon credits are widely recognized for their effectiveness in mitigating climate change because forests are significant carbon sinks, capable of absorbing large amounts of carbon dioxide over long periods.

The demand for forestry carbon credits is primarily driven by the need for businesses and governments to offset their emissions as part of climate action plans. Forest-based projects also provide multiple co-benefits, including biodiversity conservation, watershed protection, and support for indigenous communities. As companies around the world strive to meet net-zero emissions targets and comply with international climate agreements such as the Paris Agreement, forestry carbon credits continue to be a preferred option for carbon offset programs. This segment is expected to remain dominant as the global demand for verified carbon credits grows.

Forestry & Landuse Carbon Credit Firearms Market Size

Land Use Carbon Credits Are Fastest Growing Due to Increasing Awareness of Sustainable Practices

Land Use Carbon Credits represent the fastest-growing segment in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market. These credits are generated from land-use practices that reduce emissions and enhance carbon sequestration, such as sustainable agriculture, agroforestry, and soil management. As the agricultural sector is one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, adopting land-use practices that promote carbon storage in the soil is increasingly viewed as a key strategy for mitigating climate change.

Land use carbon credits are gaining traction due to the growing awareness of the environmental impact of agriculture and land management. Governments, corporations, and NGOs are investing in initiatives that integrate sustainable land-use practices to improve soil health, reduce deforestation, and increase carbon sequestration. Additionally, land-use projects are often more cost-effective than forestry projects, making them an attractive option for organizations seeking to reduce their carbon footprints at a lower cost. As the market for sustainable agriculture and land management grows, land-use carbon credits are expected to experience rapid expansion.

Carbon Offset Programs Application Is Largest Due to Regulatory and Voluntary Demands

The Carbon Offset Programs application is the largest segment in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market. Carbon offset programs enable organizations, governments, and individuals to compensate for their carbon emissions by purchasing carbon credits generated from forestry and land-use projects. These programs play a central role in meeting global climate targets, offering a flexible and verifiable solution for carbon reduction that complements direct emissions reductions.

As governments and industries set more ambitious carbon reduction goals, the role of carbon offset programs is becoming increasingly important. Organizations are seeking certified carbon credits to ensure that their offsetting activities are legitimate and contribute to meaningful environmental benefits. Additionally, voluntary carbon offset programs, driven by corporate sustainability initiatives, are becoming more popular as businesses strive to achieve net-zero emissions and align with stakeholder expectations. As a result, carbon offset programs remain the largest application for forestry and land-use carbon credits, further driving growth in this market.

Corporations & Enterprises End-Use Industry Is Largest Due to Corporate Sustainability Initiatives

The Corporations & Enterprises end-use industry is the largest segment in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market. With increasing pressure from stakeholders, consumers, and regulatory bodies, businesses across various sectors are adopting sustainability initiatives to reduce their carbon footprints. Purchasing forestry and land-use carbon credits is one of the most effective ways for corporations to offset their emissions while supporting global climate goals.

Corporations are also using carbon credits as part of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies, as they seek to align with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. Major corporations in industries such as manufacturing, energy, and retail are increasingly integrating carbon credits into their sustainability strategies to meet net-zero goals and enhance their green credentials. As businesses continue to prioritize climate action and environmental stewardship, the demand for forestry and land-use carbon credits from corporations and enterprises is expected to remain strong, solidifying this segment as the largest end-use industry in the market.

North America Is Largest Region Due to Strong Regulatory Frameworks and Corporate Engagement

North America is the largest region in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market, driven by robust regulatory frameworks and strong corporate engagement in sustainability efforts. In the United States and Canada, environmental regulations, climate policies, and carbon offset programs have paved the way for increased investment in forestry and land-use carbon credit projects. Additionally, the region is home to many global corporations that are committed to achieving net-zero emissions and are actively purchasing carbon credits to offset their environmental impact.

North American governments, businesses, and environmental organizations are at the forefront of efforts to combat climate change, and the region has a well-established market for carbon credits. As companies in the region continue to adopt sustainable practices and pursue corporate sustainability goals, the demand for verified carbon credits from forestry and land-use projects is expected to continue growing. North America remains a key driver of innovation and expansion in the forestry and land-use carbon credit market.

Forestry & Landuse Carbon Credit Firearms Market Size by Region 2030

Competitive Landscape and Key Players

The Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market is competitive, with several key players contributing to the growth and development of carbon offset projects. Leading companies in this market include Natural Capital Partners, South Pole Group, EcoAct, and Verra, among others. These companies specialize in developing, verifying, and trading carbon credits derived from forestry, land-use, and other environmental projects.

Competitive strategies in the market focus on enhancing project transparency, improving verification processes, and expanding carbon credit offerings to meet the growing demand from corporations and governments. Additionally, partnerships with environmental organizations, sustainability-focused businesses, and governmental bodies are key drivers of market growth. As the global focus on climate change intensifies, these key players are well-positioned to lead the way in providing high-quality forestry and land-use carbon credits to businesses and governments committed to reducing their carbon footprints.

Recent Developments:

  • South Pole Group expanded its carbon credit portfolio by partnering with forestry conservation projects in Southeast Asia to enhance carbon sequestration efforts.
  • Verra announced updates to its carbon credit certification process, aimed at increasing transparency and improving environmental impact reporting.
  • Natural Capital Partners introduced a new set of carbon offset initiatives focusing on land use management and reforestation projects to meet growing demand for carbon credits.
  • Carbon Credit Capital launched a blockchain-based platform to track and trade forestry and Land use carbon credits, ensuring greater transparency in the carbon credit market.
  • BioCarbon Partners secured new funding to expand its land-based carbon offset projects, focusing on sustainable agriculture and forest management in Africa.

List of Leading Companies:

  • TerraPass, Inc.
  • ClimateCare Ltd.
  • South Pole Group
  • Ecosphere+
  • Natural Capital Partners
  • Carbon Credit Capital
  • Forest Carbon Ltd.
  • The Greenhouse Gas Management Institute
  • Carbon Footprint Ltd.
  • Verra
  • Gold Standard Foundation
  • BioCarbon Partners
  • C-Quest Capital
  • Envira International LLC
  • Carbon Clean Solutions Ltd.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 4.3 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 9.1 Billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

13.5%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market By Type (Forestry Carbon Credits, Land Use Carbon Credits, Combined Carbon Credits), By End-Use Industry (Corporations & Enterprises, Governments & Nonprofits, Environmental Organizations), By Application (Carbon Offset Programs, Carbon Footprint Reduction, Corporate Sustainability Initiatives)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

TerraPass, Inc., ClimateCare Ltd., South Pole Group, Ecosphere+, Natural Capital Partners, Carbon Credit Capital, The Greenhouse Gas Management Institute, Carbon Footprint Ltd., Verra, Gold Standard Foundation, BioCarbon Partners, C-Quest Capital, Carbon Clean Solutions Ltd.

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Forestry Carbon Credits

   4.2. Land Use Carbon Credits

   4.3. Combined Carbon Credits

5. Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by End-Use Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Corporations & Enterprises

   5.2. Governments & Nonprofits

   5.3. Environmental Organizations

6. Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Carbon Offset Programs

   6.2. Carbon Footprint Reduction

   6.3. Corporate Sustainability Initiatives

7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Regional Overview

   7.2. North America

      7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      7.2.3. Opportunities

      7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      7.2.5. Technology Trends

      7.2.6. North America Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Type

      7.2.7. North America Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by End-Use Industry

      7.2.8. North America Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Application

      7.2.9. By Country

         7.2.9.1. US

               7.2.9.1.1. US Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Type

               7.2.9.1.2. US Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by End-Use Industry

               7.2.9.1.3. US Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market, by Application

         7.2.9.2. Canada

         7.2.9.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   7.3. Europe

   7.4. Asia-Pacific

   7.5. Latin America

   7.6. Middle East & Africa

8. Competitive Landscape

   8.1. Overview of the Key Players

   8.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      8.2.2. Market Consolidation

      8.2.3. Product Innovation

   8.3. Company Share Analysis

   8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      8.4.1. Strategic Overview

      8.4.2. Product Innovations

   8.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   8.8. Manufacturing Network

      8.8.1. Locations

      8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   8.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   8.11. Buying Criteria

9. Company Profiles

   9.1. TerraPass, Inc.

      9.1.1. Company Overview

      9.1.2. Company Financials

      9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      9.1.4. Recent Developments

      9.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   9.2. ClimateCare Ltd.

   9.3. South Pole Group

   9.4. Ecosphere+

   9.5. Natural Capital Partners

   9.6. Carbon Credit Capital

   9.7. Forest Carbon Ltd.

   9.8. The Greenhouse Gas Management Institute

   9.9. Carbon Footprint Ltd.

   9.10. Verra

   9.11. Gold Standard Foundation

   9.12. BioCarbon Partners

   9.13. C-Quest Capital

   9.14. Envira International LLC

   9.15. Carbon Clean Solutions Ltd.

10. Appendix

 

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Forestry & Landuse Carbon Credit Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -Forestry & Landuse Carbon Credit Firearms Market

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Forestry & Land use Carbon Credit Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -Forestry & Landuse Carbon Credit Firearms Market

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

NA

Please state your requirements.


I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options