Citric Acid Market By Form (Anhydrous Citric Acid, Liquid Citric Acid), By Application (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care & Cosmetics, Cleaning & Detergents, Industrial Uses), By End-User (Food & Beverage Manufacturers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Personal Care & Cosmetics Industry, Household & Industrial Cleaning Companies, Chemical & Industrial Processing Firms); Global Insights & Forecast (2024 - 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Citric Acid Market was valued at USD 4.2 Billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 6.2 Billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 6.9% during 2025 - 2030.

The citric acid market is experiencing steady growth, driven by its widespread application across multiple industries, including food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, personal care, and industrial manufacturing. Known for its acidity regulation, preservative properties, and chelating capabilities, citric acid is a key ingredient in a variety of consumer and industrial products. Rising consumer demand for natural and clean-label ingredients in food and personal care formulations has further propelled market expansion.

Anhydrous Citric Acid Segment Is Largest Due to Its Versatility and Stability

Anhydrous citric acid dominates the market due to its extended shelf life, ease of storage, and broad application across various industries. Its powdered form allows for precise formulation in food products, pharmaceuticals, and personal care items. The food and beverage sector is a significant contributor to demand, as anhydrous citric acid is widely used as an acidulant, flavor enhancer, and preservative in carbonated drinks, confectionery, and processed foods. Additionally, its role in pharmaceuticals as an excipient and effervescent agent has further strengthened its market position.

  Citric Acid Market  Size

Cleaning & Detergents Segment Is Fastest Growing Due to Eco-Friendly Cleaning Solutions

The cleaning and detergents segment is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by increasing consumer preference for biodegradable and non-toxic cleaning agents. Citric acid’s effectiveness as a natural chelating agent and its ability to break down mineral deposits make it a preferred alternative to synthetic chemicals in household and industrial cleaning products. As regulatory bodies push for eco-friendly cleaning solutions, the demand for citric acid in detergents, surface cleaners, and dishwashing liquids is rising significantly.

Food & Beverage Manufacturers Segment Is Largest Due to High Consumption in Processed Foods

Food and beverage manufacturers represent the largest end-user segment, as citric acid is an essential ingredient in soft drinks, fruit juices, jams, and dairy products. Its multifunctional properties, including flavor enhancement, pH regulation, and microbial inhibition, make it indispensable in food processing. The growing demand for clean-label and organic food products has further increased the adoption of citric acid as a natural acidulant and preservative. With the expansion of the food processing industry worldwide, this segment continues to dominate the market.

North America Is Largest Market Due to Strong Demand in Food, Pharmaceuticals, and Cleaning Industries

North America leads the citric acid market, driven by high demand from the food and beverage, pharmaceutical, and cleaning industries. The region's stringent regulations favoring natural and non-toxic ingredients in consumer goods have accelerated the adoption of citric acid. Additionally, the growing trend toward sustainable and biodegradable cleaning solutions in the U.S. and Canada has boosted citric acid consumption in household and industrial cleaners. The presence of major food and pharmaceutical manufacturers further reinforces North America's dominance in the market.

 Citric Acid Market  Size by Region 2030

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The citric acid market is highly competitive, with key players such as Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM), Jungbunzlauer, Tate & Lyle, and Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. dominating the landscape. Companies are focusing on capacity expansion, product innovation, and sustainable sourcing of raw materials to strengthen their market position. The shift toward bio-based production and increasing R&D investments in high-purity citric acid variants are shaping the competitive dynamics. With growing regulatory support for natural ingredients and expanding application areas, the market is poised for sustained growth in the coming years.

List of Leading Companies:

  • Archer Daniels Midland Company
  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Tate & Lyle PLC
  • Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG
  • Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd.
  • COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd.
  • Gadot Biochemical Industries Ltd.
  • RZBC Group Co., Ltd.
  • S.A. Citrique Belge N.V.
  • Shandong Juxian Hongde Citric Acid Co., Ltd.
  • TTCA Co., Ltd.
  • Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical Co., Ltd.
  • Kenko Corporation
  • MP Biomedicals, LLC
  • Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd.

Recent Developments:

  • Cargill, Incorporated expanded its citric acid production capacity in February 2025 to meet rising demand in the food and beverage industry.
  • Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG launched a new sustainable citric acid solution in January 2025 to cater to the pharmaceutical sector.
  • Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. announced a strategic partnership in December 2024 to strengthen its supply chain for food-grade citric acid.
  • Tate & Lyle PLC introduced an innovative organic citric acid formulation in November 2024 aimed at the personal care industry.
  • RZBC Group Co., Ltd. received regulatory approval in October 2024 for an advanced citric acid production technology to enhance purity and efficiency.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 4.2 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 6.2 Billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

6.9%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Citric Acid Market By Form (Anhydrous Citric Acid, Liquid Citric Acid), By Application (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care & Cosmetics, Cleaning & Detergents, Industrial Uses), By End-User (Food & Beverage Manufacturers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Personal Care & Cosmetics Industry, Household & Industrial Cleaning Companies, Chemical & Industrial Processing Firms)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, Tate & Lyle PLC, Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG, Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd., COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd., RZBC Group Co., Ltd., S.A. Citrique Belge N.V., Shandong Juxian Hongde Citric Acid Co., Ltd., TTCA Co., Ltd., Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical Co., Ltd., Kenko Corporation, Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd., ,

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

Frequently Asked Questions

The Citric Acid Market was valued at USD 4.2 Billion in 2024-e and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 6.9% of over from 2025 to 2030.

Citric acid is widely used as a preservative, acidulant, and pH regulator in food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and industrial applications.

The food & beverage, pharmaceutical, and cleaning & detergent industries are the primary consumers of citric acid.

Citric acid is a natural chelating agent that removes mineral deposits, improves cleaning efficiency, and enhances eco-friendliness.

Asia-Pacific leads the market due to high production capacities in China and growing demand from food and industrial applications.

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Citric Acid Market, by Form (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Anhydrous Citric Acid

   4.2. Liquid Citric Acid

   4.3. Others

5. Citric Acid Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. Food & Beverages

   5.2. Pharmaceuticals

   5.3. Personal Care & Cosmetics

   5.4. Cleaning & Detergents

   5.5. Industrial Uses

   5.6. Others

6. Citric Acid Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Food & Beverage Manufacturers

   6.2. Pharmaceutical Companies

   6.3. Personal Care & Cosmetics Industry

   6.4. Household & Industrial Cleaning Companies

   6.5. Chemical & Industrial Processing Firms

   6.6. Others

7. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Regional Overview

   7.2. North America

      7.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      7.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      7.2.3. Opportunities

      7.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      7.2.5. Technology Trends

      7.2.6. North America Citric Acid Market, by Form

      7.2.7. North America Citric Acid Market, by Application

      7.2.8. North America Citric Acid Market, by End-User

      7.2.9. By Country

         7.2.9.1. US

               7.2.9.1.1. US Citric Acid Market, by Form

               7.2.9.1.2. US Citric Acid Market, by Application

               7.2.9.1.3. US Citric Acid Market, by End-User

         7.2.9.2. Canada

         7.2.9.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   7.3. Europe

   7.4. Asia-Pacific

   7.5. Latin America

   7.6. Middle East & Africa

8. Competitive Landscape

   8.1. Overview of the Key Players

   8.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      8.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      8.2.2. Market Consolidation

      8.2.3. Product Innovation

   8.3. Company Share Analysis

   8.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      8.4.1. Strategic Overview

      8.4.2. Product Innovations

   8.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   8.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   8.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   8.8. Manufacturing Network

      8.8.1. Locations

      8.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      8.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      8.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      8.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   8.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   8.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   8.11. Buying Criteria

9. Company Profiles

   9.1. Archer Daniels Midland Company

      9.1.1. Company Overview

      9.1.2. Company Financials

      9.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      9.1.4. Recent Developments

      9.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   9.2. Cargill, Incorporated

   9.3. Tate & Lyle PLC

   9.4. Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG

   9.5. Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd.

   9.6. COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd.

   9.7. Gadot Biochemical Industries Ltd.

   9.8. RZBC Group Co., Ltd.

   9.9. S.A. Citrique Belge N.V.

   9.10. Shandong Juxian Hongde Citric Acid Co., Ltd.

   9.11. TTCA Co., Ltd.

   9.12. Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical Co., Ltd.

   9.13. Kenko Corporation

   9.14. MP Biomedicals, LLC

   9.15. Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd.

10. Appendix

 

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on The Citric Acid Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on Citric Acid Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach -

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the E-Waste Management ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of Citric Acid Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down -

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

Please state your requirements.

  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Swaziland+268
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options