sales@intentmarketresearch.com
+1 463-583-2713
As per Intent Market Research, the Biological Safety Testing Market was valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 5.6 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 20.9% during 2024 - 2030.
The biological safety testing market has emerged as a cornerstone in ensuring the quality and safety of biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, and advanced therapies such as gene and cell therapies. With growing regulatory scrutiny, the market is being driven by the rapid expansion of biologics production and the increasing demand for high-quality therapeutic solutions. The adoption of cutting-edge technologies and an increasing number of product launches in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors are further bolstering the market growth.
Among the product types, Kits & Reagents account for the largest market share due to their indispensable role in performing biological safety tests across various applications. These products are crucial in sterility, endotoxin, and bioburden testing due to their ability to provide reliable, accurate, and reproducible results. With an expanding portfolio of ready-to-use and customizable kits, manufacturers are addressing the increasing needs of biopharmaceutical companies for efficient testing solutions.
Additionally, the growing prevalence of outsourced biological safety testing services has significantly boosted the demand for these reagents, as they are vital for streamlined testing workflows. The development of innovative reagent technologies further cements this segment's dominance in the market.
The Endotoxin Testing segment is witnessing the fastest growth within the test type category. This growth is primarily attributed to the burgeoning vaccine development sector, where stringent safety requirements necessitate comprehensive testing to detect bacterial endotoxins. Additionally, the advent of new rapid and automated endotoxin detection methods has propelled the segment forward, reducing testing time and enhancing accuracy.
The increasing adoption of these tests in biologics production, particularly monoclonal antibodies and biosimilars, highlights their critical role in maintaining quality and safety standards. Innovations in endotoxin testing technologies, including recombinant factor C assays, are further expected to drive market growth.
Within the application segment, Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy is the largest and fastest-growing subsegment, driven by the expanding pipeline of advanced therapies. As these therapies represent cutting-edge treatments for genetic disorders and cancer, rigorous safety testing is paramount. Regulatory authorities worldwide have set stringent guidelines for testing biological safety, particularly in this highly sensitive area.
The growing investment in research and development for cell and gene therapies, coupled with the increasing number of clinical trials, is creating significant demand for biological safety testing solutions tailored to these applications. This has also encouraged collaborations between manufacturers and research organizations to develop advanced testing kits and services.
In the end-user segment, Contract Research Organizations (CROs) are the fastest-growing category, fueled by the trend of outsourcing biological safety testing. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are increasingly partnering with CROs to leverage their specialized expertise, cost-efficiency, and faster turnaround times. This trend is particularly strong among small to medium-sized enterprises that lack in-house testing capabilities.
CROs are also capitalizing on the increasing demand for comprehensive biological safety testing services by offering end-to-end solutions that cover a wide range of applications. Their ability to adapt quickly to evolving regulatory standards and incorporate advanced testing technologies makes them a preferred choice for many biopharmaceutical companies.
Geographically, North America holds the largest share in the biological safety testing market due to its advanced biopharmaceutical infrastructure, high R&D investment, and stringent regulatory framework. The region is home to numerous global pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, along with a well-established network of CROs and academic institutions.
Furthermore, North America's leadership in vaccine production and innovation in gene and cell therapies has propelled the demand for biological safety testing solutions. The increasing focus on rapid test kits and advanced technologies further strengthens the region’s dominance.
The biological safety testing market is characterized by intense competition, with major players such as Charles River Laboratories, Lonza Group, and Thermo Fisher Scientific leading the industry. These companies are heavily investing in R&D to develop innovative testing solutions and expand their service portfolios.
Collaborations, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships are common strategies among key players to strengthen their market position. The competitive landscape is also witnessing the entry of new players focusing on niche areas such as recombinant technologies and rapid testing solutions, driving further innovation in the industry.
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023) |
USD 1.5 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 5.6 Billion |
CAGR (2024 – 2030) |
20.9% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023 |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Biological Safety Testing Market by Product Type (Instruments, Kits & Reagents, Services), Test Type (Sterility Testing, Bioburden Testing, Endotoxin Testing, Residual Host Contaminant Detection, Cell Line Authentication & Characterization Tests, Adventitious Agent Detection Tests), Application (Vaccine Development, Blood and Plasma Product Testing, Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy, Biopharmaceutical Production), End-User (Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations (CROs), Academic and Research Institutes) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
Charles River Laboratories, Lonza Group AG, Merck KGaA, Sartorius AG, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., SGS S.A., Eurofins Scientific, WuXi AppTec, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Toxikon Corporation, Cytovance Biologics, Avance Biosciences Inc., Paragon Bioservices (Catalent), Pacific BioLabs, Nelson Labs |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Biological Safety Testing Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
4.1. Instruments |
4.2. Kits & Reagents |
4.3. Services |
5. Biological Safety Testing Market, by Test Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
5.1. Sterility Testing |
5.2. Bioburden Testing |
5.3. Endotoxin Testing |
5.4. Residual Host Contaminant Detection |
5.5. Cell Line Authentication & Characterization Tests |
5.6. Adventitious Agent Detection Tests |
5.7. Other Tests |
6. Biological Safety Testing Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
6.1. Vaccine Development |
6.2. Blood and Plasma Product Testing |
6.3. Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy |
6.4. Biopharmaceutical Production |
6.5. Other Applications |
7. Biological Safety Testing Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
7.1. Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies |
7.2. Contract Research Organizations (CROs) |
7.3. Academic and Research Institutes |
7.4. Others |
8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
8.1. Regional Overview |
8.2. North America |
8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3. Opportunities |
8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5. Technology Trends |
8.2.6. North America Biological Safety Testing Market, by Product Type |
8.2.7. North America Biological Safety Testing Market, by Test Type |
8.2.8. North America Biological Safety Testing Market, by Application |
8.2.9. North America Biological Safety Testing Market, by |
8.2.10. By Country |
8.2.10.1. US |
8.2.10.1.1. US Biological Safety Testing Market, by Product Type |
8.2.10.1.2. US Biological Safety Testing Market, by Test Type |
8.2.10.1.3. US Biological Safety Testing Market, by Application |
8.2.10.1.4. US Biological Safety Testing Market, by |
8.2.10.2. Canada |
8.2.10.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
8.3. Europe |
8.4. Asia-Pacific |
8.5. Latin America |
8.6. Middle East & Africa |
9. Competitive Landscape |
9.1. Overview of the Key Players |
9.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
9.2.2. Market Consolidation |
9.2.3. Product Innovation |
9.3. Company Share Analysis |
9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1. Strategic Overview |
9.4.2. Product Innovations |
9.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8. Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1. Locations |
9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11. Buying Criteria |
10. Company Profiles |
10.1. Charles River Laboratories |
10.1.1. Company Overview |
10.1.2. Company Financials |
10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4. Recent Developments |
10.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2. Lonza Group AG |
10.3. Merck KGaA |
10.4. Sartorius AG |
10.5. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. |
10.6. SGS S.A. |
10.7. Eurofins Scientific |
10.8. WuXi AppTec |
10.9. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. |
10.10. Toxikon Corporation |
10.11. Cytovance Biologics |
10.12. Avance Biosciences Inc. |
10.13. Paragon Bioservices (Catalent) |
10.14. Pacific BioLabs |
10.15. Nelson Labs |
11. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Biological Safety Testing Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Biological Safety Testing Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Biological Safety Testing ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Biological Safety Testing Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.