sales@intentmarketresearch.com
+1 463-583-2713
As per Intent Market Research, the Automated Container Terminal Market was valued at USD 9.4 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 15.8 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 7.6% during 2024 - 2030.
The Automated Container Terminal (ACT) market has witnessed remarkable growth over the past decade, driven by the increasing demand for faster, more efficient, and safer port operations. As global trade and cargo volumes rise, ports are turning to automation to meet these challenges. Automation technology in container terminals includes a wide array of solutions ranging from fully automated systems to semi-automated operations, with each offering distinct benefits in terms of cost reduction, operational efficiency, and scalability. These technological innovations aim to optimize container handling processes, minimize human error, and accelerate throughput. The market for automated container terminals is becoming increasingly competitive, with significant investments being made by both technology providers and terminal operators to enhance operational capabilities.
Fully automated terminals have become the largest segment in the automated container terminal market, accounting for a substantial share of the industry. These terminals are equipped with state-of-the-art technologies such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs), automated stacking cranes (ASCs), and robotic quay cranes that operate with minimal human intervention. The adoption of fully automated terminals is driven by the need for improved efficiency, lower labor costs, and the ability to operate around the clock, providing higher throughput and reduced turnaround times for ships. Additionally, fully automated terminals are more reliable and offer enhanced safety compared to manual and semi-automated terminals, making them a preferred choice for large ports around the world.
In fully automated terminals, the integration of advanced technologies such as AI and machine learning further optimizes operational processes, enabling predictive maintenance, real-time decision-making, and reduced operational risks. Leading ports in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America are increasingly adopting fully automated terminal solutions to stay competitive and meet the demands of growing global trade. As the complexity of logistics increases, the need for fully automated systems to manage large-scale cargo operations is expected to continue growing, making this segment the largest in the market.
The technology segment of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) is the fastest growing, as these vehicles play a crucial role in automating the movement of containers within ports and terminals. AGVs are mobile robots that transport containers between different locations in the terminal without human intervention. Their demand is growing rapidly due to their ability to improve operational efficiency by reducing the time required to move containers, and they are also cost-effective in the long run. AGVs are capable of handling heavy containers and navigating autonomously using sensors and advanced mapping technology.
The implementation of AGVs in automated container terminals allows for seamless integration with other automation technologies, including quay cranes and stacking cranes. As more ports adopt AGVs to streamline operations and reduce manual labor, the technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated. AGVs are expected to drive further market growth as port operators seek to implement full automation to compete with global trade dynamics. The growth of AGVs is also supported by innovations in battery life, AI-based navigation systems, and integration with Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for enhanced connectivity.
The end-user industry segment of Ports & Harbors is the largest, owing to the significant investments being made in terminal automation by large port operators. As the backbone of international trade, ports handle millions of containers annually, and automation is seen as a critical way to increase efficiency, reduce operational costs, and cope with the increasing volume of global trade. Ports and harbors are increasingly adopting automated solutions to optimize container handling, improve safety, and increase throughput, which is particularly important as the scale of container ships continues to grow. These advancements are vital in addressing the operational challenges posed by larger vessels, tighter schedules, and the need for faster turnaround times.
Port operators are also motivated by the need to meet regulatory requirements, including environmental standards. Automated technologies allow for better tracking and monitoring, as well as enhanced reporting capabilities to ensure compliance with international regulations. The push for greener, more sustainable operations has led ports to embrace automation as a means of reducing emissions, optimizing energy consumption, and enhancing overall operational efficiency. As a result, ports and harbors are expected to remain the largest end-user industry in the automated container terminal market for the foreseeable future.
The deployment mode of On-Premises solutions is currently the largest in the automated container terminal market. Many ports and terminal operators prefer on-premises deployment due to the control it provides over security, infrastructure, and integration with existing systems. On-premises solutions allow terminal operators to customize automation systems according to their specific needs, ensuring a seamless transition to automated operations. Additionally, on-premises deployments offer the benefit of reduced latency, which is critical in real-time decision-making and operational efficiency in container handling.
While cloud-based solutions are gaining traction due to their flexibility and scalability, on-premises deployment remains the preferred choice for large ports that require robust control over their operations. As port operators continue to prioritize data security and reliability, the on-premises deployment mode is expected to retain its dominance in the market.
The Asia-Pacific region is the largest market for automated container terminals, driven by major ports in China, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan. These countries are at the forefront of adopting automation technologies to handle the growing volume of global trade. The region’s ports are investing heavily in automated solutions to increase throughput, improve safety, and reduce labor costs. Additionally, the presence of leading terminal operators and technology providers in Asia-Pacific is further boosting the market in this region.
With the increasing demand for more efficient port operations, coupled with advancements in automation technology, Asia-Pacific will continue to lead the market in terms of adoption and revenue generation. The region’s large and growing container shipping industry, along with the emphasis on technological innovation, ensures that it will remain the dominant market for automated container terminals in the coming years.
The automated container terminal market is highly competitive, with several major players dominating the landscape. Leading companies such as Konecranes, Cargotec, ZPMC, and Kalmar Global are driving innovation in automation solutions. These companies offer a range of technologies, including automated guided vehicles (AGVs), automated stacking cranes (ASCs), and robotic quay cranes, which are being integrated into port operations worldwide.
In addition to these established players, emerging companies and technology innovators are also entering the market, contributing to the dynamic competitive landscape. The focus is on developing solutions that reduce operational costs, enhance throughput, and integrate seamlessly with existing port systems. As the market evolves, partnerships, acquisitions, and strategic collaborations are expected to increase, enabling companies to expand their technological capabilities and gain a larger market share.
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023) |
USD 9.4 Billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 15.8 Billion |
CAGR (2024 – 2030) |
7.6% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023 |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Automated Container Terminal Market By Automation Type (Fully Automated Terminals, Semi-Automated Terminals, Manual Terminals), By Technology (Automated Guided Vehicles, Automated Stacking Cranes, Quay Cranes, Automated Mobile Cranes), By End-User Industry (Ports & Harbors, Freight & Cargo Companies, Logistics & Transportation), and By Deployment Mode (On-Premises, Cloud-Based) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Major Companies |
ABB Ltd.,Cargotec Corporation,China COSCO Shipping Corporation,Hutchison Ports,Hyster-Yale Group,Jungheinrich AG,Kalmar Global,Konecranes,Liebherr Group,Navis LLC,PSA International,Samsung Heavy Industries,ST Engineering,TMEIC Corporation,ZPMC |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
4.1. Fully Automated Terminals |
4.2. Semi-Automated Terminals |
4.3. Manual Terminals |
5. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
5.1. Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) |
5.2. Automated Stacking Cranes (ASCs) |
5.3. Quay Cranes |
5.4. Automated Mobile Cranes |
6. Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
6.1. Ports & Harbors |
6.2. Freight & Cargo Companies |
6.3. Logistics & Transportation |
7. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
7.1. On-Premises |
7.2. Cloud-Based |
8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
8.1. Regional Overview |
8.2. North America |
8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3. Opportunities |
8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5. Technology Trends |
8.2.6. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type |
8.2.7. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology |
8.2.8. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry |
8.2.9. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode |
8.2.10. By Country |
8.2.10.1. US |
8.2.10.1.1. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type |
8.2.10.1.2. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology |
8.2.10.1.3. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry |
8.2.10.1.4. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode |
8.2.10.2. Canada |
8.2.10.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
8.3. Europe |
8.4. Asia-Pacific |
8.5. Latin America |
8.6. Middle East & Africa |
9. Competitive Landscape |
9.1. Overview of the Key Players |
9.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
9.2.2. Market Consolidation |
9.2.3. Product Innovation |
9.3. Company Share Analysis |
9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1. Strategic Overview |
9.4.2. Product Innovations |
9.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8. Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1. Locations |
9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11. Buying Criteria |
10. Company Profiles |
10.1. ABB Ltd. |
10.1.1. Company Overview |
10.1.2. Company Financials |
10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4. Recent Developments |
10.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2. Cargotec Corporation |
10.3. China COSCO Shipping Corporation |
10.4. Hutchison Ports |
10.5. Hyster-Yale Group |
10.6. Jungheinrich AG |
10.7. Kalmar Global |
10.8. Konecranes |
10.9. Liebherr Group |
10.10. Navis LLC |
10.11. PSA International |
10.12. Samsung Heavy Industries |
10.13. ST Engineering |
10.14. TMEIC Corporation |
10.15. ZPMC |
11. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Automated Container Terminal Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Automated Container Terminal Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Automated Container Terminal ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Automated Container Terminal Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.