sales@intentmarketresearch.com

  +1 463-583-2713

Automated Container Terminal Market By Automation Type (Fully Automated Terminals, Semi-Automated Terminals, Manual Terminals), By Technology (Automated Guided Vehicles, Automated Stacking Cranes, Quay Cranes, Automated Mobile Cranes), By End-User Industry (Ports & Harbors, Freight & Cargo Companies, Logistics & Transportation), and By Deployment Mode (On-Premises, Cloud-Based); Global Insights & Forecast (2024 – 2030)

Published: December, 2024  
|   Report ID: AT4543  
|   Automotive and Transportation

As per Intent Market Research, the Automated Container Terminal Market was valued at USD 9.4 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 15.8 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 7.6% during 2024 - 2030.

The Automated Container Terminal (ACT) market has witnessed remarkable growth over the past decade, driven by the increasing demand for faster, more efficient, and safer port operations. As global trade and cargo volumes rise, ports are turning to automation to meet these challenges. Automation technology in container terminals includes a wide array of solutions ranging from fully automated systems to semi-automated operations, with each offering distinct benefits in terms of cost reduction, operational efficiency, and scalability. These technological innovations aim to optimize container handling processes, minimize human error, and accelerate throughput. The market for automated container terminals is becoming increasingly competitive, with significant investments being made by both technology providers and terminal operators to enhance operational capabilities.

Automation Type is Largest Owing to Fully Automated Terminals

Fully automated terminals have become the largest segment in the automated container terminal market, accounting for a substantial share of the industry. These terminals are equipped with state-of-the-art technologies such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs), automated stacking cranes (ASCs), and robotic quay cranes that operate with minimal human intervention. The adoption of fully automated terminals is driven by the need for improved efficiency, lower labor costs, and the ability to operate around the clock, providing higher throughput and reduced turnaround times for ships. Additionally, fully automated terminals are more reliable and offer enhanced safety compared to manual and semi-automated terminals, making them a preferred choice for large ports around the world.

In fully automated terminals, the integration of advanced technologies such as AI and machine learning further optimizes operational processes, enabling predictive maintenance, real-time decision-making, and reduced operational risks. Leading ports in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America are increasingly adopting fully automated terminal solutions to stay competitive and meet the demands of growing global trade. As the complexity of logistics increases, the need for fully automated systems to manage large-scale cargo operations is expected to continue growing, making this segment the largest in the market.

Technology Segment is Fastest Growing Owing to Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)

The technology segment of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) is the fastest growing, as these vehicles play a crucial role in automating the movement of containers within ports and terminals. AGVs are mobile robots that transport containers between different locations in the terminal without human intervention. Their demand is growing rapidly due to their ability to improve operational efficiency by reducing the time required to move containers, and they are also cost-effective in the long run. AGVs are capable of handling heavy containers and navigating autonomously using sensors and advanced mapping technology.

The implementation of AGVs in automated container terminals allows for seamless integration with other automation technologies, including quay cranes and stacking cranes. As more ports adopt AGVs to streamline operations and reduce manual labor, the technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated. AGVs are expected to drive further market growth as port operators seek to implement full automation to compete with global trade dynamics. The growth of AGVs is also supported by innovations in battery life, AI-based navigation systems, and integration with Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for enhanced connectivity.

Automated Container Terminal Market Size

End-User Industry is Largest in Ports & Harbors

The end-user industry segment of Ports & Harbors is the largest, owing to the significant investments being made in terminal automation by large port operators. As the backbone of international trade, ports handle millions of containers annually, and automation is seen as a critical way to increase efficiency, reduce operational costs, and cope with the increasing volume of global trade. Ports and harbors are increasingly adopting automated solutions to optimize container handling, improve safety, and increase throughput, which is particularly important as the scale of container ships continues to grow. These advancements are vital in addressing the operational challenges posed by larger vessels, tighter schedules, and the need for faster turnaround times.

Port operators are also motivated by the need to meet regulatory requirements, including environmental standards. Automated technologies allow for better tracking and monitoring, as well as enhanced reporting capabilities to ensure compliance with international regulations. The push for greener, more sustainable operations has led ports to embrace automation as a means of reducing emissions, optimizing energy consumption, and enhancing overall operational efficiency. As a result, ports and harbors are expected to remain the largest end-user industry in the automated container terminal market for the foreseeable future.

Deployment Mode is Largest in On-Premises

The deployment mode of On-Premises solutions is currently the largest in the automated container terminal market. Many ports and terminal operators prefer on-premises deployment due to the control it provides over security, infrastructure, and integration with existing systems. On-premises solutions allow terminal operators to customize automation systems according to their specific needs, ensuring a seamless transition to automated operations. Additionally, on-premises deployments offer the benefit of reduced latency, which is critical in real-time decision-making and operational efficiency in container handling.

While cloud-based solutions are gaining traction due to their flexibility and scalability, on-premises deployment remains the preferred choice for large ports that require robust control over their operations. As port operators continue to prioritize data security and reliability, the on-premises deployment mode is expected to retain its dominance in the market.

Asia-Pacific Region is Largest Due to High Port Activity

The Asia-Pacific region is the largest market for automated container terminals, driven by major ports in China, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan. These countries are at the forefront of adopting automation technologies to handle the growing volume of global trade. The region’s ports are investing heavily in automated solutions to increase throughput, improve safety, and reduce labor costs. Additionally, the presence of leading terminal operators and technology providers in Asia-Pacific is further boosting the market in this region.

With the increasing demand for more efficient port operations, coupled with advancements in automation technology, Asia-Pacific will continue to lead the market in terms of adoption and revenue generation. The region’s large and growing container shipping industry, along with the emphasis on technological innovation, ensures that it will remain the dominant market for automated container terminals in the coming years.

Automated Container Terminal Market Size by Region 2030

Leading Companies and Competitive Landscape

The automated container terminal market is highly competitive, with several major players dominating the landscape. Leading companies such as Konecranes, Cargotec, ZPMC, and Kalmar Global are driving innovation in automation solutions. These companies offer a range of technologies, including automated guided vehicles (AGVs), automated stacking cranes (ASCs), and robotic quay cranes, which are being integrated into port operations worldwide.

In addition to these established players, emerging companies and technology innovators are also entering the market, contributing to the dynamic competitive landscape. The focus is on developing solutions that reduce operational costs, enhance throughput, and integrate seamlessly with existing port systems. As the market evolves, partnerships, acquisitions, and strategic collaborations are expected to increase, enabling companies to expand their technological capabilities and gain a larger market share.

Recent Developments:

  • Konecranes launched an advanced automated container handling system to enhance port efficiency and reduce operational costs.
  • Cargotec Corporation expanded its automation portfolio by acquiring a robotics firm specializing in automated guided vehicles (AGVs).
  • PSA International implemented AI-powered automation at its terminals, enhancing container processing speeds and improving decision-making in real-time.
  • Kalmar Global unveiled a new model of Automated Stacking Cranes that promises to improve stack density and reduce energy consumption.
  • China COSCO Shipping Corporation announced significant investments in smart port automation technologies to improve container logistics operations and reduce human error.

List of Leading Companies:

  • ABB Ltd.
  • Cargotec Corporation
  • China COSCO Shipping Corporation
  • Hutchison Ports
  • Hyster-Yale Group
  • Jungheinrich AG
  • Kalmar Global
  • Konecranes
  • Liebherr Group
  • Navis LLC
  • PSA International
  • Samsung Heavy Industries
  • ST Engineering
  • TMEIC Corporation
  • ZPMC

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2023)

USD 9.4 Billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 15.8 Billion

CAGR (2024 – 2030)

7.6%

Base Year for Estimation

2023

Historic Year

2022

Forecast Period

2024 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Automated Container Terminal Market By Automation Type (Fully Automated Terminals, Semi-Automated Terminals, Manual Terminals), By Technology (Automated Guided Vehicles, Automated Stacking Cranes, Quay Cranes, Automated Mobile Cranes), By End-User Industry (Ports & Harbors, Freight & Cargo Companies, Logistics & Transportation), and By Deployment Mode (On-Premises, Cloud-Based)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

ABB Ltd.,Cargotec Corporation,China COSCO Shipping Corporation,Hutchison Ports,Hyster-Yale Group,Jungheinrich AG,Kalmar Global,Konecranes,Liebherr Group,Navis LLC,PSA International,Samsung Heavy Industries,ST Engineering,TMEIC Corporation,ZPMC

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   4.1. Fully Automated Terminals

   4.2. Semi-Automated Terminals

   4.3. Manual Terminals

5. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   5.1. Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)

   5.2. Automated Stacking Cranes (ASCs)

   5.3. Quay Cranes

   5.4. Automated Mobile Cranes

6. Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   6.1. Ports & Harbors

   6.2. Freight & Cargo Companies

   6.3. Logistics & Transportation

7. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   7.1. On-Premises

   7.2. Cloud-Based

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type

      8.2.7. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology

      8.2.8. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry

      8.2.9. North America Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Technology

               8.2.10.1.3. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by End-User Industry

               8.2.10.1.4. US Automated Container Terminal Market, by Deployment Mode

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. ABB Ltd.

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Cargotec Corporation

   10.3. China COSCO Shipping Corporation

   10.4. Hutchison Ports

   10.5. Hyster-Yale Group

   10.6. Jungheinrich AG

   10.7. Kalmar Global

   10.8. Konecranes

   10.9. Liebherr Group

   10.10. Navis LLC

   10.11. PSA International

   10.12. Samsung Heavy Industries

   10.13. ST Engineering

   10.14. TMEIC Corporation

   10.15. ZPMC

11. Appendix

Let us connect with you TOC

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy I agree to its terms

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Automated Container Terminal Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Automated Container Terminal Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Research Approach - Automated Container Terminal Market

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Automated Container Terminal ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Automated Container Terminal Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Bottom Up and Top Down - Automated Container Terminal Market

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

Let us connect with you


I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy I agree to its terms
Available Formats
REPORT BUYING OPTIONS


Buy Now