Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market By Product Type (Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems (ABUS), Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS)), By Technology (3D Automated Breast Ultrasound, Conventional Automated Ultrasound), By Application (Screening, Diagnosis), By End-User (Hospitals, Diagnostic Imaging Centers, Specialty Clinics), and By Region; Global Insights & Forecast (2023 – 2030)

As per Intent Market Research, the Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market was valued at USD 2.4 billion in 2024-e and will surpass USD 4.2 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 9.8% during 2025 - 2030.

The automated breast ultrasound systems (ABUS) market is experiencing rapid growth due to increasing breast cancer prevalence, advancements in imaging technology, and growing awareness about early cancer detection. Traditional mammography often struggles to detect tumors in women with dense breast tissue, driving the adoption of automated ultrasound systems as a complementary screening tool. ABUS and automated breast volume scanners (ABVS) offer enhanced imaging accuracy, standardized screening protocols, and improved workflow efficiency for radiologists, making them a preferred choice in breast cancer diagnostics.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in automated ultrasound systems has further boosted market expansion. AI-driven algorithms assist in image analysis, lesion detection, and reporting efficiency, reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient outcomes. Additionally, rising government initiatives promoting breast cancer screening programs and the increasing availability of reimbursement policies are fueling market growth. With continuous innovations in ultrasound imaging and the rising need for non-invasive diagnostic tools, the ABUS market is expected to witness sustained demand.

Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems (ABUS) Hold the Largest Share Owing to Their Widespread Adoption in Dense Breast Screening

Automated breast ultrasound systems (ABUS) dominate the product segment due to their significant role in improving breast cancer detection, particularly in women with dense breast tissue. Unlike traditional mammography, which has limitations in dense breasts, ABUS provides consistent and reproducible 3D imaging, allowing radiologists to detect tumors with greater accuracy. These systems reduce operator dependency and ensure standardized imaging, leading to their widespread adoption in hospitals and imaging centers.

Regulatory approvals, such as the FDA’s endorsement of ABUS for breast cancer screening, have further propelled their market growth. Many healthcare facilities are integrating ABUS into their routine screening programs to enhance early detection rates. Moreover, ongoing advancements in ultrasound technology, including AI-powered image interpretation and automation features, are strengthening the dominance of ABUS in the market. As awareness about breast density-related cancer risks increases, the demand for ABUS is expected to rise further.

Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market Size

3D Automated Breast Ultrasound Technology Leads the Market Due to Superior Imaging Capabilities and High Diagnostic Accuracy

3D automated breast ultrasound technology holds the largest share in the market due to its ability to provide detailed volumetric imaging, enhancing lesion characterization and early cancer detection. Unlike conventional automated ultrasound, 3D ABUS captures entire breast volumes and reconstructs high-resolution images, enabling radiologists to analyze multiple imaging planes for better diagnosis. This technology minimizes the limitations of handheld ultrasound by offering greater consistency and reducing human error.

The growing preference for 3D ABUS is also driven by its integration with AI-based image processing tools, which further enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Hospitals and diagnostic centers increasingly favor 3D ABUS as part of comprehensive breast screening programs, particularly for high-risk patient groups. As technological advancements continue to improve imaging clarity, workflow automation, and user-friendliness, 3D ABUS is expected to maintain its leading position in the market.

Screening is the Largest Application Segment Due to Rising Breast Cancer Awareness and Government-Led Screening Programs

The screening segment dominates the ABUS market, driven by the increasing focus on early breast cancer detection and government initiatives promoting nationwide screening programs. With breast cancer being one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths globally, early detection through regular screening is crucial in improving survival rates. Automated breast ultrasound systems are widely used in population-based screening programs, especially for women with dense breasts, where traditional mammography may not be as effective.

Many countries have introduced policies mandating supplemental breast ultrasound screening for women with dense breast tissue, further driving demand for ABUS. Additionally, advancements in automated imaging technology have improved the speed and accuracy of screening procedures, making them more efficient for large-scale adoption. As healthcare systems continue to emphasize preventive diagnostics, the demand for ABUS in breast cancer screening is expected to grow significantly.

Hospitals Are the Leading End-User Due to High Patient Volume and Adoption of Advanced Diagnostic Technologies

Hospitals hold the largest share in the end-user segment, owing to their role as primary healthcare providers for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. With a high volume of patients undergoing routine breast cancer screenings and diagnostic evaluations, hospitals are increasingly integrating automated ultrasound systems into their radiology departments. The availability of multidisciplinary teams, access to cutting-edge imaging technologies, and reimbursement policies further support hospital adoption of ABUS.

Moreover, hospitals are at the forefront of implementing AI-driven imaging solutions and automated diagnostic tools, enhancing workflow efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. Many hospitals also collaborate with government screening programs and research institutions to expand breast cancer screening services. As healthcare infrastructure continues to advance and hospitals invest in state-of-the-art imaging modalities, their dominance in the ABUS market is expected to persist.

North America Leads the Market Due to Strong Healthcare Infrastructure and High Awareness of Breast Cancer Screening

North America is the largest regional market for automated breast ultrasound systems, driven by well-established healthcare infrastructure, high breast cancer awareness, and strong government support for screening programs. The region has witnessed a growing adoption of ABUS in hospitals, diagnostic centers, and specialty clinics due to its proven efficacy in dense breast imaging. The presence of major market players, continuous technological advancements, and favorable reimbursement policies further contribute to market growth.

The United States, in particular, has stringent breast cancer screening guidelines and a high number of regulatory-approved ABUS systems, supporting widespread adoption. Additionally, increasing investments in AI-powered imaging solutions and research collaborations between healthcare institutions and technology firms are propelling market expansion. As the demand for accurate and efficient breast cancer diagnostics continues to rise, North America is expected to maintain its leading position in the ABUS market.

Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market Size by Region 2030

Competitive Landscape and Key Players

The automated breast ultrasound systems market is highly competitive, with key players such as GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers, Canon Medical Systems, and Hologic Inc. leading the industry. These companies focus on continuous innovation, AI integration, and strategic partnerships to strengthen their market presence. Investments in research and development for enhanced imaging technologies, improved workflow automation, and regulatory approvals are key strategies adopted by market leaders.

The growing focus on personalized diagnostics, cloud-based imaging solutions, and AI-powered radiology tools is reshaping the competitive landscape. Emerging players are entering the market with cost-effective and technologically advanced solutions, intensifying competition. As healthcare providers prioritize efficiency, accuracy, and patient-centered care, companies that offer innovative, high-performance ABUS solutions will continue to gain a competitive edge.

List of Leading Companies:

  • GE HealthCare
  • Siemens Healthineers
  • Canon Medical Systems Corporation
  • Koninklijke Philips N.V.
  • Hologic, Inc.
  • Hitachi Ltd.
  • SonoCiné Inc.
  • Seno Medical Instruments
  • Delphinus Medical Technologies, Inc.
  • iVu Imaging Corporation
  • Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.
  • SuperSonic Imagine
  • QT Imaging Inc.
  • MetriTrack, Inc.
  • NovaSignal Corp.

 

 Recent Developments:

  • In January 2025, GE HealthCare introduced a next-generation AI-powered ABUS for enhanced breast cancer screening.
  • In December 2024, Siemens Healthineers received FDA approval for its latest 3D breast ultrasound system.
  • In November 2024, Hologic announced a strategic partnership to integrate AI-driven diagnostics into ABUS technology.
  • In October 2024, Canon Medical Systems launched an automated breast ultrasound scanner with improved image resolution.
  • In September 2024, Delphinus Medical Technologies expanded its ABUS product line to improve dense breast tissue detection.

Report Scope:

Report Features

Description

Market Size (2024-e)

USD 2.4 billion

Forecasted Value (2030)

USD 4.2 billion

CAGR (2025 – 2030)

9.8%

Base Year for Estimation

2024-e

Historic Year

2023

Forecast Period

2025 – 2030

Report Coverage

Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments

Segments Covered

Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market By Product Type (Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems (ABUS), Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS)), By Technology (3D Automated Breast Ultrasound, Conventional Automated Ultrasound), By Application (Screening, Diagnosis), By End-User (Hospitals, Diagnostic Imaging Centers, Specialty Clinics)

Regional Analysis

North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Major Companies

GE HealthCare, Siemens Healthineers, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Hologic, Inc., Hitachi Ltd., SonoCiné Inc., Seno Medical Instruments, Delphinus Medical Technologies, Inc., iVu Imaging Corporation, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., SuperSonic Imagine, QT Imaging Inc., MetriTrack, Inc., NovaSignal Corp.

Customization Scope

Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements

Frequently Asked Questions

The Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market was valued at USD 2.4 billion in 2024-e and is expected to grow at a CAGR of over 9.8% from 2025 to 2030.

Rising breast cancer incidence, advancements in ultrasound technology, and increasing preference for non-invasive diagnostics.

ABUS provides better detection in dense breast tissue, whereas mammography is more commonly used for initial screening.

AI-driven image analysis, 3D volumetric imaging, and improved transducer sensitivity are enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Hospitals and diagnostic imaging centers are the primary adopters, followed by specialty clinics for breast cancer detection.

1. Introduction

   1.1. Market Definition

   1.2. Scope of the Study

   1.3. Research Assumptions

   1.4. Study Limitations

2. Research Methodology

   2.1. Research Approach

      2.1.1. Top-Down Method

      2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method

      2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis

  2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process

      2.2.1. Secondary Research

      2.2.2. Primary Research

   2.3. Data Mining Process

      2.3.1. Data Analysis

      2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation

      2.3.3. Data Triangulation

3. Executive Summary

   3.1. Major Markets & Segments

   3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries

   3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors

   3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country

4. Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Product Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   4.1. Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems (ABUS)

   4.2. Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS)

   4.3. Others

5. Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   5.1. 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound

   5.2. Conventional Automated Ultrasound

   5.3. Others

6. Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Application (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   6.1. Screening

   6.2. Diagnosis

   6.3. Others

7. Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by End-User (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   7.1. Hospitals

   7.2. Diagnostic Imaging Centers

   7.3. Specialty Clinics

   7.4. Others

8. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2023 – 2030)

   8.1. Regional Overview

   8.2. North America

      8.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers

      8.2.2. Barriers & Challenges

      8.2.3. Opportunities

      8.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis

      8.2.5. Technology Trends

      8.2.6. North America Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Product Type

      8.2.7. North America Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Technology

      8.2.8. North America Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Application

      8.2.9. North America Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by End-User

      8.2.10. By Country

         8.2.10.1. US

               8.2.10.1.1. US Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Product Type

               8.2.10.1.2. US Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Technology

               8.2.10.1.3. US Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by Application

               8.2.10.1.4. US Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market, by End-User

         8.2.10.2. Canada

         8.2.10.3. Mexico

    *Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country

   8.3. Europe

   8.4. Asia-Pacific

   8.5. Latin America

   8.6. Middle East & Africa

9. Competitive Landscape

   9.1. Overview of the Key Players

   9.2. Competitive Ecosystem

      9.2.1. Level of Fragmentation

      9.2.2. Market Consolidation

      9.2.3. Product Innovation

   9.3. Company Share Analysis

   9.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix

      9.4.1. Strategic Overview

      9.4.2. Product Innovations

   9.5. Start-up Ecosystem

   9.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives

   9.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix

   9.8. Manufacturing Network

      9.8.1. Locations

      9.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics

      9.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization

      9.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity

      9.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

   9.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix

   9.10. Technology Maturity Curve

   9.11. Buying Criteria

10. Company Profiles

   10.1. GE HealthCare

      10.1.1. Company Overview

      10.1.2. Company Financials

      10.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio

      10.1.4. Recent Developments

      10.1.5. IMR Analysis

    *Similar information will be provided for other companies 

   10.2. Siemens Healthineers

   10.3. Canon Medical Systems Corporation

   10.4. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

   10.5. Hologic, Inc.

   10.6. Hitachi Ltd.

   10.7. SonoCiné Inc.

   10.8. Seno Medical Instruments

   10.9. Delphinus Medical Technologies, Inc.

   10.10. iVu Imaging Corporation

   10.11. Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.

   10.12. SuperSonic Imagine

   10.13. QT Imaging Inc.

   10.14. MetriTrack, Inc.

   10.15. NovaSignal Corp.

11. Appendix

A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Secondary Research

Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.

Primary Research

Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:

  • Validating findings and assumptions derived from secondary research
  • Gathering qualitative and quantitative data on market trends, drivers, and challenges
  • Understanding the demand-side dynamics, encompassing end-users, component manufacturers, facility providers, and service providers
  • Assessing the supply-side landscape, including technological advancements and recent developments

Market Size Assessment

A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Automated Breast Ultrasound Systems Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:

  1. Identification of key industry players and relevant revenues through extensive secondary research
  2. Determination of the industry's supply chain and market size, in terms of value, through primary and secondary research processes
  3. Calculation of percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns using secondary sources and verification through primary sources

Data Triangulation

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.

Please state your requirements.


I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. I agree to its terms.

Report Buying Options