sales@intentmarketresearch.com
+1 463-583-2713
As per Intent Market Research, the Agricultural Fumigants Market was valued at USD 2.6 billion in 2023 and will surpass USD 3.4 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 3.9% during 2024 - 2030.
The agricultural fumigants market is segmented by type, application, and geography. Each segment caters to specific agricultural needs, ranging from soil fumigation to post-harvest treatment. As farmers and agronomists increasingly adopt integrated pest management (IPM) practices, the role of fumigants in safeguarding crop health and enhancing productivity becomes paramount. With ongoing innovations in fumigation technology and formulations, the agricultural fumigants market is poised for robust growth in the coming years.
The methyl bromide segment is the largest within the agricultural fumigants market, primarily due to its broad-spectrum efficacy against a wide range of pests and diseases. Methyl bromide has been a staple in agricultural fumigation for decades, effectively controlling nematodes, fungi, insects, and weeds. Its versatility makes it suitable for various applications, including soil treatment and storage facilities. Despite concerns regarding its environmental impact and phase-out in certain regions, methyl bromide remains widely used in many countries, particularly for high-value crops.
The continued dominance of methyl bromide in the market can be attributed to its effectiveness in achieving rapid pest control and the ability to penetrate difficult-to-reach areas. Additionally, the agricultural community's reliance on this fumigant for critical crops has ensured its sustained usage, even as alternatives are explored. As regulations around methyl bromide become more stringent, there is an ongoing effort to develop and adopt more sustainable alternatives that can provide similar efficacy without the associated environmental concerns.
The phosphine segment is the fastest-growing category within the agricultural fumigants market, driven by its increasing demand for storage fumigation applications. Phosphine, often generated from aluminum phosphide and magnesium phosphide, is widely used to control pests in stored grains, cereals, and other agricultural products. Its effectiveness against a broad spectrum of pests, coupled with its relatively low environmental impact compared to other fumigants, has positioned phosphine as a preferred choice for many agricultural stakeholders.
The rapid growth of the phosphine segment can be attributed to the globalization of trade and the need for pest-free exports. As countries emphasize the quality and safety of food products, the demand for efficient storage solutions has surged. Moreover, phosphine's ease of use and cost-effectiveness make it an attractive option for grain handlers and storage facilities. The continuous development of improved formulations and application techniques further enhances the segment's growth potential, ensuring that phosphine remains a vital component of pest management strategies in agriculture.
The soil fumigation segment is a significant player in the agricultural fumigants market, holding the largest share due to its essential role in crop protection. Soil fumigation involves the application of fumigants to the soil before planting to control pests, pathogens, and weeds that can hinder crop development. This method is particularly crucial for high-value crops such as fruits, vegetables, and ornamentals, where the prevention of soil-borne diseases can have a substantial impact on yield and quality.
The dominance of soil fumigation is supported by the increasing awareness of soil health and its direct correlation with crop productivity. As farmers prioritize soil management practices to improve fertility and structure, the use of fumigants for soil treatment has become increasingly important. Furthermore, advancements in fumigation technologies, including precision application techniques, have enhanced the effectiveness of soil fumigation, driving its continued growth in the agricultural sector.
The post-harvest fumigation segment is the fastest-growing category within the agricultural fumigants market, fueled by rising food safety concerns and the need for effective pest control in stored products. This segment addresses the critical phase of protecting harvested crops from pests during storage and transport. With increasing global trade and consumer awareness of food quality, the demand for post-harvest fumigation solutions is on the rise.
Post-harvest fumigation is essential for maintaining the quality and safety of food products, particularly grains and perishables. As pest infestations can lead to significant economic losses and food waste, stakeholders are increasingly adopting fumigation practices to ensure pest-free storage conditions. The growth of the post-harvest fumigation segment is further supported by technological advancements in fumigation methods, which enhance efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
The North American region is the largest market for agricultural fumigants, driven by established agricultural practices and a significant emphasis on pest management. The United States and Canada have well-developed agricultural sectors that rely on effective fumigation strategies to protect crops and ensure high yields. The use of fumigants in both soil and post-harvest applications is prevalent, particularly for major crops such as corn, soybeans, and fruits.
North America's dominance in the agricultural fumigants market is supported by the region's regulatory framework, which facilitates the safe and effective use of fumigants. Furthermore, the ongoing adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) practices is driving demand for innovative fumigation solutions. As farmers continue to prioritize crop protection and productivity, North America is expected to maintain its leadership position in the agricultural fumigants market in the coming years.
The competitive landscape of the global agricultural fumigants market is characterized by several key players that are driving innovation and sustainability in the industry. The top companies in this sector include:
The competitive landscape of the agricultural fumigants market is characterized by ongoing innovation and a focus on sustainability. Companies are increasingly investing in research and development to create new formulations and enhance the effectiveness of fumigants. The collaboration between agricultural technology firms and traditional chemical manufacturers is also driving the development of integrated solutions that meet the evolving needs of farmers. As the market continues to grow, competition is expected to intensify, with a strong emphasis on delivering high-quality, effective, and sustainable agricultural fumigants.
The report will help you answer some of the most critical questions in the Agricultural Fumigants Market. A few of them are as follows:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023) |
USD 2.6 billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 3.4 billion |
CAGR (2024 – 2030) |
3.9% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023 |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024 – 2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
Agricultural Fumigants Market By Type (Methyl Bromide, Phosphine, Chloropicrin, Sulfuryl Fluoride, Carbamates), By Application Method (Soil Fumigation, Structural Fumigation, Commodity Fumigation), By Crop Type (Cereals and Grains, Fruits and Vegetables, Nuts and Seeds, Turf and Ornamental Plants), By Formulation Type (Solid, Liquid, Gas), and By Function (Pest Control, Disease Control, Weed Control) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa) |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1. Introduction |
1.1. Market Definition |
1.2. Scope of the Study |
1.3. Research Assumptions |
1.4. Study Limitations |
2. Research Methodology |
2.1. Research Approach |
2.1.1. Top-Down Method |
2.1.2. Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3. Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2. Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1. Secondary Research |
2.2.2. Primary Research |
2.3. Data Mining Process |
2.3.1. Data Analysis |
2.3.2. Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3. Data Triangulation |
3. Executive Summary |
3.1. Major Markets & Segments |
3.2. Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3. Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4. Regulatory Overview by Country |
4. Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
4.1. Methyl Bromide |
4.2. Phosphine |
4.3. Chloropicrin |
4.4. Sulfuryl Fluoride |
4.5. Carbamates |
4.6. Others |
5. Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Application Method (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
5.1. Soil Fumigation |
5.2. Structural Fumigation |
5.3. Commodity Fumigation |
6. Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Crop Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
6.1. Cereals and Grains |
6.2. Fruits and Vegetables |
6.3. Nuts and Seeds |
6.4. Turf and Ornamental Plants |
6.5. Others |
7. Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Formulation Type (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
7.1. Solid |
7.2. Liquid |
7.3. Gas |
8. Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Function (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
8.1. Pest Control |
8.2. Disease Control |
8.3. Weed Control |
8.4. Others |
9. Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Million, 2022 – 2030) |
9.1. Regional Overview |
9.2. North America |
9.2.1. Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
9.2.2. Barriers & Challenges |
9.2.3. Opportunities |
9.2.4. Factor Impact Analysis |
9.2.5. Technology Trends |
9.2.6. North America Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Type |
9.2.7. North America Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Application Method |
9.2.8. North America Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Crop Type |
9.2.9. North America Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Formulation Type |
9.2.10. North America Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Function |
9.2.11. By Country |
9.2.11.1. US |
9.2.11.1.1. US Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Type |
9.2.11.1.2. US Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Application Method |
9.2.11.1.3. US Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Crop Type |
9.2.11.1.4. US Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Formulation Type |
9.2.11.1.5. US Agricultural Fumigants Market, by Function |
9.2.11.2. Canada |
9.2.11.3. Mexico |
*Similar segmentation will be provided for each region and country |
9.3. Europe |
9.4. Asia-Pacific |
9.5. Latin America |
9.6. Middle East & Africa |
10. Competitive Landscape |
10.1. Overview of the Key Players |
10.2. Competitive Ecosystem |
10.2.1. Level of Fragmentation |
10.2.2. Market Consolidation |
10.2.3. Product Innovation |
10.3. Company Share Analysis |
10.4. Company Benchmarking Matrix |
10.4.1. Strategic Overview |
10.4.2. Product Innovations |
10.5. Start-up Ecosystem |
10.6. Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
10.7. ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
10.8. Manufacturing Network |
10.8.1. Locations |
10.8.2. Supply Chain and Logistics |
10.8.3. Product Flexibility/Customization |
10.8.4. Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
10.8.5. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
10.9. Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
10.10. Technology Maturity Curve |
10.11. Buying Criteria |
11. Company Profiles |
11.1. AMVAC |
11.1.1. Company Overview |
11.1.2. Company Financials |
11.1.3. Product/Service Portfolio |
11.1.4. Recent Developments |
11.1.5. IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
11.2. BASF |
11.3. Bayer |
11.4. FMC Corporation |
11.5. Isagro |
11.6. Nufarm |
11.7. SGS SA |
11.8. Sumitomo Chemical |
11.9. Syngenta |
11.10. UPL Limited |
12. Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the Agricultural Fumigants Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to analyze the parent market and relevant adjacencies to measure the impact of them on the Agricultural Fumigants Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the Agricultural Fumigants ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to analyze the overall size of the Agricultural Fumigants Market. These methods were also employed to assess the size of various subsegments within the market. The market size assessment methodology encompassed the following steps:
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size assessment.